000125357 001__ 125357
000125357 005__ 20241125101139.0
000125357 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/agronomy13030798
000125357 0248_ $$2sideral$$a133094
000125357 037__ $$aART-2023-133094
000125357 041__ $$aeng
000125357 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-2469-0363$$aHerrera, Marta$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000125357 245__ $$aMycotoxins and crop yield in maize as affected by irrigation management and tillage practices
000125357 260__ $$c2023
000125357 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000125357 5203_ $$aIn addition to the weather conditions, agronomic practices can have a major influence on maize crop yield and contamination with mycotoxins. In this work, the effect of different irrigation systems (flood vs. sprinkler irrigation), sprinkler irrigation management (low vs. high frequency, daytime vs. nighttime irrigation) and tillage practices (conventional tillage, no tillage with or without crop stover) on crop yield and the contamination with aflatoxins (AFs), fumonisins (FUM) and deoxynivalenol (DON) were evaluated in the maize grain from two experimental maize fields. No aflatoxins were detected in any of the samples analyzed. DON and FUM levels were significantly higher when the sprinkler irrigation was performed at nighttime (0.54 and 1.21 mg kg−1, respectively) as compared to daytime (0.38 and 0.45 mg kg−1). Likewise, DON and FUM were greater when irrigation frequency was low (0.61 and 1.09 mg kg−1, respectively) in comparison with high frequency (0.30 and 0.57 mg kg−1). DON concentrations were significantly higher in fields with sprinkler irrigation (0.53 mg kg−1) as compared to flood irrigation (0.19 mg kg−1), while the levels of FUM were very similar regardless of the maize irrigation system. Mycotoxin concentrations were not affected by the different soil tillage practices. This highlights the importance of implementing crop management practices to minimize the risk of mycotoxin contamination in maize.
000125357 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/AEI/PID2019-106877RA-I00$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/AGL2013-48728-C2-1-R$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/AGL2013-49062-C4-4-R
000125357 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000125357 590__ $$a3.3$$b2023
000125357 592__ $$a0.688$$b2023
000125357 591__ $$aAGRONOMY$$b20 / 126 = 0.159$$c2023$$dQ1$$eT1
000125357 593__ $$aAgronomy and Crop Science$$c2023$$dQ1
000125357 591__ $$aPLANT SCIENCES$$b65 / 265 = 0.245$$c2023$$dQ1$$eT1
000125357 594__ $$a6.2$$b2023
000125357 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000125357 700__ $$aCavero, José
000125357 700__ $$aFranco-Luesma, Samuel
000125357 700__ $$aÁlvaro-Fuentes, Jorge$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000125357 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-6325-7100$$aAriño, Agustín$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000125357 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-1961-8551$$aLorán, Susana$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000125357 7102_ $$12008$$2640$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Produc.Animal Cienc.Ali.$$cÁrea Nutrición Bromatología
000125357 7102_ $$15011$$2705$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. CC.Agrar.y Medio Natural$$cÁrea Producción Vegetal
000125357 773__ $$g13, 3 (2023), 798 [11pp.]$$pAgronomy (Basel)$$tAgronomy (Basel)$$x2073-4395
000125357 8564_ $$s299387$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/125357/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000125357 8564_ $$s2673453$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/125357/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000125357 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:125357$$particulos$$pdriver
000125357 951__ $$a2024-11-22-12:01:59
000125357 980__ $$aARTICLE