<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/s40279-023-01816-1</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Knopp, Melanie</dc:creator><dc:creator>Muñiz-Pardos, Borja</dc:creator><dc:creator>Wackerhage, Henning</dc:creator><dc:creator>Schönfelder, Martin</dc:creator><dc:creator>Guppy, Fergus</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pitsiladis, Yannis</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ruiz, Daniel</dc:creator><dc:title>Variability in running economy of Kenyan world-class and European amateur male runners with advanced footwear running technology: experimental and meta-analysis results</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2023-133178</dc:identifier><dc:description>Background
Advanced footwear technology improves average running economy compared with racing flats in sub-elite athletes. However, not all athletes benefit as performance changes vary from a 10% drawback to a 14% improvement. The main beneficiaries from such technologies, world-class athletes, have only been analyzed using race times.
Objective
The aim of this study was to measure running economy on a laboratory treadmill in advanced footwear technology compared to a traditional racing flat in world-class Kenyan (mean half-marathon time: 59:30 min:s) versus European amateur runners.
Methods
Seven world-class Kenyan and seven amateur European male runners completed a maximal oxygen uptake assessment and submaximal steady-state running economy trials in three different models of advanced footwear technology and a racing flat. To confirm our results and better understand the overall effect of new technology in running shoes, we conducted a systematic search and meta-analysis.
Results
Laboratory results revealed large variability in both world-class Kenyan road runners, which ranged from a 11.3% drawback to a 11.4% benefit, and amateur Europeans, which ranged from a 9.7% benefit to a 1.1% drawback in running economy of advanced footwear technology compared to a flat. The post-hoc meta-analysis revealed an overall significant medium benefit of advanced footwear technology on running economy compared with traditional flats.
Conclusions
Variability of advanced footwear technology performance appears in both world-class and amateur runners, suggesting further testing should examine such variability to ensure validity of results and explain the cause as a more personalized approach to shoe selection might be necessary for optimal benefit.</dc:description><dc:date>2023</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/125753</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1007/s40279-023-01816-1</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/125753</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:125753</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>SPORTS MEDICINE 53, 6 (2023), 1255-1271</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>