000126032 001__ 126032
000126032 005__ 20241125101155.0
000126032 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s41348-023-00741-9
000126032 0248_ $$2sideral$$a133528
000126032 037__ $$aART-2023-133528
000126032 041__ $$aeng
000126032 100__ $$aLanga-Lomba, Natalia
000126032 245__ $$aScreening of Vitis vinifera cultivars from the Grapevine Germplasm Bank of Aragon for susceptibility to Botryosphaeria dieback fungi
000126032 260__ $$c2023
000126032 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000126032 5203_ $$aGrapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) are taking the forefront of winegrowers’ concerns, as they cause considerable damage in vineyards not only quantitatively but also qualitatively. Furthermore, in the last three decades, an increasing incidence of the socioeconomic impact of these fungal pathologies has been observed. To date, no effective control strategies or curative treatments are available for these diseases that can replace the effectiveness offered by a series of chemical synthesis fungicides currently prohibited by European legislation. In this scenario, screening for less sensitive cultivars is regarded as a sustainable approach for GTDs management. In the study presented herein, the tolerance/susceptibility of 25 cultivars from the Grapevine Germplasm Bank of Aragon (Movera, Zaragoza, Spain) including commercial, local, or minority germplasm, was tested against two pathogens associated with Botryosphaeria dieback (viz. Neofusicoccum parvum and Diplodia seriata), which were inoculated in a detached cutting assay under open-air conditions. Based on lesion length development after eight months, significant differences were detected among the cultivars in the length of internal (vascular) necroses. In general terms, all cultivars were susceptible to fungal infection, but ‘Macabeo’ and one of the ‘Garnacha Tinta’ ecotypes under study (from Villanueva de Huerva, Zaragoza) would be the least susceptible white and red cultivars, respectively. On the other hand, ‘Monegrina’, ‘Grumel’, and ‘Torcijón’ would be among the least tolerant cultivars to fungal infection.
000126032 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000126032 590__ $$a2.1$$b2023
000126032 592__ $$a0.457$$b2023
000126032 591__ $$aAGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY$$b25 / 89 = 0.281$$c2023$$dQ2$$eT1
000126032 593__ $$aAgronomy and Crop Science$$c2023$$dQ2
000126032 591__ $$aPLANT SCIENCES$$b110 / 265 = 0.415$$c2023$$dQ2$$eT2
000126032 593__ $$aPlant Science$$c2023$$dQ2
000126032 593__ $$aHorticulture$$c2023$$dQ2
000126032 594__ $$a4.3$$b2023
000126032 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000126032 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-2535-6914$$aGonzález-García, Vicente$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000126032 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-2713-2786$$aMartín-Ramos, Pablo
000126032 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-3009-0935$$aCasanova-Gascón, José$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000126032 7102_ $$15011$$2705$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. CC.Agrar.y Medio Natural$$cÁrea Producción Vegetal
000126032 7102_ $$15011$$2063$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. CC.Agrar.y Medio Natural$$cÁrea Botánica
000126032 773__ $$g130, 5 (2023), 999–1006$$pJ. Plant Dis. Prot.$$tJournal of Plant Diseases and Protection$$x1861-3829
000126032 8564_ $$s948662$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/126032/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000126032 8564_ $$s2607308$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/126032/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000126032 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:126032$$particulos$$pdriver
000126032 951__ $$a2024-11-22-12:08:45
000126032 980__ $$aARTICLE