<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.3344/kjp.23011</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Bellosta-López, Pablo</dc:creator><dc:creator>Doménech-García, Víctor</dc:creator><dc:creator>Palsson, Thorvaldur Skuli</dc:creator><dc:creator>Herrero, Pablo</dc:creator><dc:creator>Christensen, Steffan Wittrup Mcphee</dc:creator><dc:title>Long-term consistency of clinical sensory testing measures for pain assessment</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2023-133712</dc:identifier><dc:description>Background: Understanding the stability of quantitative sensory tests (QSTs) over time is important to aid clinicians in selecting a battery of tests for assessing and monitoring patients. This study evaluated the short- and long-term reliability of selected QSTs.
Methods: Twenty healthy women participated in three experimental sessions: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 6 months. Measurements included pressure pain thresholds (PPT) in the neck, upper back, and leg; Pressure-cuff pain tolerance around the upper-arm; conditioned pain modulation during a pressure-cuff stimulus; and referred pain following a suprathreshold pressure stimulation. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated.
Results: Reliability for PPT was excellent for all sites at 2 weeks (ICC, 0.96–0.99; MDC, 22–55 kPa) and from good to excellent at 6 months (ICC, 0.88–0.95; MDC, 47–91 kPa). ICC for pressure-cuff pain tolerance indicated excellent reliability at both times (0.91–0.97). For conditioned pain modulation, reliability was moderate for all sites at 2 weeks (ICC, 0.57–0.74; MDC, 24%–35%), while it was moderate at the neck (ICC, 0.54; MDC, 27%) and poor at the upper back and leg at 6 months. ICC for referred pain areas was excellent at 2 weeks (0.90) and good at 6 months (0.86).
Conclusions: PPT, pressure pain tolerance, and pressure-induced referred pain should be considered reliable procedures to assess the pain-sensory profile over time. In contrast, conditioned pain modulation was shown to be unstable. Future studies prospectively analyzing the pain-sensory profile will be able to better calculate appropriate sample sizes.</dc:description><dc:date>2023</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/126232</dc:source><dc:doi>10.3344/kjp.23011</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/126232</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:126232</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/FPI/CPB09-2018</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MCIU/FPU19-05237</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>Korean Journal of Pain 36, 2 (2023), 173-183</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by-nc</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>