One-year follow-up of the effectiveness of a lifestyle modification programme as an adjuvant treatment of depression in primary care: a randomised clinical trial
Resumen: Background: An estimated 280 million individuals suffer from depression. Brief group interventions in Primary Healthcare Centres (PHCs) are recommended. One goal of these interventions is to educate people about healthy lifestyle habits, as they prevent the development of depression. This study aims to analyse the one-year follow-up results about the effectiveness of a Lifestyle Modification Programme (LMP) and an LMP plus Information and Communication Technologies (LMP + ICTs) when compared to Treatment as Usual (TAU). Methods: We conducted an open-label, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised clinical trial. A total of 188 individuals that visited a general practitioner and met the inclusion criteria were randomised. LMP consisted of six weekly 90-minute group sessions focusing on lifestyle improvement. LMP + ICTs was a hybrid of the LMP format with the inclusion of a wearable smartwatch. We used linear mixed models (with a random intercept and an unstructured covariance) to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions, and an intention-to-treat analysis and Multiple Imputation technique for handling missing data. Results: LMP + ICTs showed a statistically significant reduction on depressive symptoms (b = −2.68, 95 % CI = [−4.239, −1.133] p = .001) and sedentarism (b = −37.38, 95 % CI [−62.930, −11.833], p = .004) compared to TAU. Limitations: Most of the dropouts were due to time restrictions. Conclusions: In long-term, LMPs plus ICTs administered in PHCs to people suffering from depression were effective in reducing depressive symptomatology and sedentarism comparing to TAU. More research is needed to enhance adherence to lifestyle recommendations. These promising programmes could be easily implemented in PHCs.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.04.007
Año: 2023
Publicado en: Journal of Affective Disorders 332 (2023), 231-237
ISSN: 0165-0327

Factor impacto JCR: 4.9 (2023)
Categ. JCR: CLINICAL NEUROLOGY rank: 35 / 280 = 0.125 (2023) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: PSYCHIATRY rank: 38 / 279 = 0.136 (2023) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: PSYCHIATRY rank: 38 / 279 = 0.136 (2023) - Q1 - T1

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 10.9 - Psychiatry and Mental Health (Q1) - Clinical Psychology (Q1)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 2.082 - Psychiatry and Mental Health (Q1) - Clinical Psychology (Q1)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/B21-20R-GAIAP
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ISCIII/PI18-01336
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ISCIII-RICAPPS/RD21-0016-0005
Tipo y forma: Article (Published version)
Área (Departamento): Área Psicología Social (Dpto. Psicología y Sociología)
Área (Departamento): Área Métodos Cuant.Econ.Empres (Dpto. Economía Aplicada)
Área (Departamento): Área Psicolog.Evolut.Educac (Dpto. Psicología y Sociología)


Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.


Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-11-22-12:05:43)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles > Artículos por área > Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economíay la Empresa
Articles > Artículos por área > Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación
Articles > Artículos por área > Psicología Social



 Record created 2023-05-25, last modified 2024-11-25


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)