<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.35869/vial.v0i20.4355</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Castellano-Risco, Irene</dc:creator><dc:creator>Martín-Gilete, Marta</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hijazo-Gascón, Alberto</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide</dc:creator><dc:title>Metaphors set in motion in the context of L2 academic spoken discourse</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2023-133609</dc:identifier><dc:description>Theoretical and applied research in physical motion events (MEs) (Talmy, 2000; Ibarretxe-Antuñano, 2017) has shown that (1) speakers tend to organize MEs around a specific semantic component resulting in at least two different lexicalization patterns (satellite-framed and verb-framed languages), with different narrative styles (Slobin, 1996, 2004); (2) the use of specific patterns may also depend on genre and discourse (Caballero, 2017); and (3) the adoption of the narrative style of an L2 is challenging (Cadierno, 2008). These findings seem to also apply to metaphorical motion events (MMEs) (Özçalışkan, 2005; Ibarretxe-Antuñano &amp; Caballero, 2014). This study analyses the linguistic realizations and discourse functions of MMEs in the specific context of oral EMI seminars to examine ME prevalence and the impact inter-typological differences may have on the production of MMEs. Data from three seminars from METCLIL corpus were selected to compare MME verb production by English L1 speakers (n=4) and L2 English speakers (satellite-framed: n=4; verb-framed: n=9). Results show that (i) individual variables (speakers’ L1 typology or lecturer’s input) do not seem to have a determining impact on MME employment, while (ii) contextual factors (to-be-performed activities) have been shown to have a more salient role in MME usage and performance of discursive functions.</dc:description><dc:date>2023</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/126305</dc:source><dc:doi>10.35869/vial.v0i20.4355</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/126305</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:126305</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/AEI-FEDER/FFI2017-82460-P</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/AEI-FEDER/FFI2017-86320-R</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/MultiMetAr LMP143-21</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/Psylex H11-17R</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN-AEI/PID2021-123302NB-I00</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/NextGenerationEU/MS-240621</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>VIAL-VIGO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS 20 (2023), 77-105</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by-nc-nd</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>