<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1080/00958964.2022.2044281</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Rosa, Claudio D.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Collado, Silvia</dc:creator><dc:creator>Larson, Lincoln R.</dc:creator><dc:title>The utility and limitations of the New Ecological Paradigm scale for children</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2022-131306</dc:identifier><dc:description>The New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) scale adapted for use with children (NEP-C) is one of the most frequently used measures of children’s environmental beliefs. Though widely utilized, the limitations of the NEP-C instrument are often overlooked. Based on a systematic synthesis of existing literature examining the NEP-C, we argue that the scale assesses specific types of beliefs within the larger NEP, that some children have difficulty comprehending items of this scale, and that the one-factor and three-factor models proposed in the original NEP-C did not achieve an exact fit to empirical data. Additionally, the relevance of the NEP-C total score as a predictor of children’s pro-environmental behaviors is questionable. Although the NEP-C is useful for measuring specific types of environmental beliefs, many researchers using this scale may be interested in broader constructs. We highlight potential benefits and drawbacks of using the NEP-C and discuss new directions for environmental education research.</dc:description><dc:date>2022</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/127066</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1080/00958964.2022.2044281</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/127066</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:127066</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 53, 2 (2022), 87-98</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by-nc</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>