<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.37201/req/007.2023</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>García-Fernández, Sergio</dc:creator><dc:creator>Calvo, Jorge</dc:creator><dc:creator>Cercenado, Emilia</dc:creator><dc:creator>Suárez-Barrenechea, Ana Isabel</dc:creator><dc:creator>Fernández-Billón, María</dc:creator><dc:creator>Castillo, Francisco Javier</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gálvez-Benítez, Lydia</dc:creator><dc:creator>Tubau, Fe</dc:creator><dc:creator>Figueroa Cerón, Ruth Esther</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hernández-Cabezas, Alicia</dc:creator><dc:creator>González Romo, Fernando</dc:creator><dc:creator>Fariñas, María Carmen</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gómez, María</dc:creator><dc:creator>Díaz-Regañón, Jazmín</dc:creator><dc:creator>Cantón, Rafael</dc:creator><dc:title>Activity of imipenem/relebactam against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Spain. SMART 2016-2020</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2023-134649</dc:identifier><dc:description>Objectives. To determine susceptibility to the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination imipenem/relebactam in clinical isolates recovered from intra-abdominal (IAI), urinary (UTI), respiratory (RTI) and bloodstream (BSI) infections in the SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) study in SPAIN during 2016 – 2020. Methods. Broth microdilution MICs for imipenem/relebactam and comparators were determined by a central laboratory against isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. MICs were interpreted using EUCAST-2021 breakpoints. Results. In total, 5,210 Enterobacterales and 1,418 P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were analyzed. Imipenem/relebactam inhibited 98.8% of Enterobacterales. Distinguishing by source of infection susceptibility was 99.1% in BSI, 99.2% in IAI, 97.9% in RTI, and 99.2% in UTI. Of intensive care unit isolates (ICU) 97.4% were susceptible and of non-ICU isolates 99.2% were susceptible. In Enterobacterales, activity against Class A, Class B and Class D carbapenemases was 96.2%, 15.4% and 73.2%, respectively. In P. aeruginosa, imipenem/relebactam was active in 92.2% of isolates. By source of infection it was 94.8% in BSI, 92.9% in IAI, 91.7% in RTI, and 93.1% in UTI. An 88.7% of ICU isolates and 93.6% of non-ICU isolates were susceptible to imipenem/relebactam. Imipenem/relebactam remained active against P. aeruginosa ceftazidime-resistant (76.3%), cefepime-resistant (73.6%), imipenem-resistant (71.5%) and piperacillin-resistant (78.7%) isolates. Of all multidrug-resistant or difficult-to-treat resistance P. aeruginosa isolates, 75.1% and 46.2%, respectively, were susceptible to imipenem/relebactam. Conclusions. Imipenem/relebactam showed high rates of susceptibility in Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates from different sources of infection as well as depending on patients’ location (ICU or non-ICU scenarios).</dc:description><dc:date>2023</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/127700</dc:source><dc:doi>10.37201/req/007.2023</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/127700</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:127700</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>Revista española de quimioterapia 36, 3 (2023), 302-309</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by-nc</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>