<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1002/batt.202300233</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Alvira, Darío</dc:creator><dc:creator>Antorán, Daniel</dc:creator><dc:creator>Vidal, Mariano</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sebastian, Victor</dc:creator><dc:creator>Manyà, Joan J.</dc:creator><dc:title>Vine Shoots-Derived Hard Carbons as Anodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries: Role of Annealing Temperature in Regulating Their Structure and Morphology</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2023-134935</dc:identifier><dc:description>Sodium‐ion batteries (SIBs) are considered one of the most promising large‐scale and low‐cost energy storage systems due to the abundance and low price of sodium. Herein, hard carbons from a sustainable biomass feedstock (vine shoots) were synthesized via a simple two‐step carbonization process at different highest temperatures to be used as anodes in SIBs. The hard carbon produced at 1200 °C delivered the highest reversible capacity (270 mAh g−1 at 0.03 A g−1, with an acceptable initial coulombic efficiency of 71 %) since a suitable balance between the pseudographitic domains growth and the retention of microporosity, defects, and functional groups was achieved. A prominent cycling stability with a capacity retention of 97 % over 315 cycles was also attained. Comprehensive characterization unraveled a three‐stage sodium storage mechanism based on adsorption, intercalation, and filling of pores. A remarkable specific capacity underestimation of up to 38 % was also found when a two‐electrode half‐cell configuration was employed to measure the rate performance. To avoid this systematic error caused by the counter/reference electrode polarization, we strongly recommend the use of a three‐electrode setup or a full‐cell configuration to correctly evaluate the anode response at moderate and high current rates.</dc:description><dc:date>2023</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/127836</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1002/batt.202300233</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/127836</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:127836</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA-FEDER/T22-23R</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/PID2021-127847OB-I00</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/PID2029-107737RB-I00</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>Batteries &amp; supercaps (2023), e202300233 [13 pp.]</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by-nc-nd</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>