000128195 001__ 128195
000128195 005__ 20241125101137.0
000128195 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1057/s41599-023-01917-2
000128195 0248_ $$2sideral$$a135388
000128195 037__ $$aART-2023-135388
000128195 041__ $$aeng
000128195 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-7730-8527$$aAguerri, Jesús C.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000128195 245__ $$aConsensus on community guidelines: an experimental study on the legitimacy of content removal in social media
000128195 260__ $$c2023
000128195 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000128195 5203_ $$aThe popularization of social media has led to a considerable increase in the importance of discursive expressions of violence, especially when directed at vulnerable communities. While social media platforms have created rules to regulate such expressions, little information is available on the perception of the legitimacy of these rules in the general population, regardless of the importance of the former for the latter. It is therefore the objective of this study to analyze the perception of the seriousness of such content and the degree to which the population has established a consensus on the withdrawal of restricted discursive behaviour on three major social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram and Twitter). For this purpose, 918 participants were immersed in an experimental paradigm in three different groups (n1 = 302; n2 = 301; n3 = 315). Each was presented with stimuli containing discursive behaviour that is banned by community guidelines. The stimuli were presented differently to each group (i.e., description of the banned behaviour, description and accompanying example, example only). Our experimental data reveals that the degree of consensus on the need to remove content is quite high, regardless of the style of presentation. It furthermore suggests that the behaviour in question is perceived as very serious, due to the harm that our participants presume it to cause. These results have important implications for the debate on freedom of expression on the Internet and its regulation by private actors.
000128195 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/FJC-2020-042961-I
000128195 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000128195 590__ $$a3.7$$b2023
000128195 592__ $$a0.871$$b2023
000128195 591__ $$aSOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY$$b13 / 267 = 0.049$$c2023$$dQ1$$eT1
000128195 593__ $$aArts and Humanities (miscellaneous)$$c2023$$dQ1
000128195 593__ $$aEconomics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)$$c2023$$dQ1
000128195 593__ $$aSocial Sciences (miscellaneous)$$c2023$$dQ1
000128195 593__ $$aPsychology (miscellaneous)$$c2023$$dQ1
000128195 593__ $$aBusiness, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)$$c2023$$dQ1
000128195 594__ $$a3.8$$b2023
000128195 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000128195 700__ $$aMiró-Llinares, Fernando
000128195 700__ $$aGómez-Bellvís, Ana B.
000128195 7102_ $$14009$$2813$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Trabajo Social y Serv.Soc
000128195 773__ $$g10, 416 (2023), 11$$pHumanit. soc. sci. commun.$$tHumanities & social sciences communications$$x2662-9992
000128195 8564_ $$s743287$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/128195/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000128195 8564_ $$s1455603$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/128195/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000128195 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:128195$$particulos$$pdriver
000128195 951__ $$a2024-11-22-12:01:18
000128195 980__ $$aARTICLE