000129325 001__ 129325
000129325 005__ 20240126182118.0
000129325 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s10657-019-09631-8
000129325 0248_ $$2sideral$$a115834
000129325 037__ $$aART-2019-115834
000129325 041__ $$aeng
000129325 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-1539-8483$$aLópez-Laborda, J.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000129325 245__ $$aConsensus and dissent in the resolution of conflicts of competence by the Spanish Constitutional Court: the role of federalism and ideology
000129325 260__ $$c2019
000129325 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000129325 5203_ $$aGiven the lack of unambiguously constitutional foundations, Spain’s Constitutional Court (TC) has being playing a leading role in building the regulatory framework of the Autonomic State. This paper analyses whether this function is sufficient to explain the level of agreement among TC justices when adopting their resolutions, and in particular, on reaching unanimous rulings. If so, the legalist/federalist model would be a more adequate model to explain the behaviour of TC justices than the other models proposed in the literature on judicial behaviour: the attitudinal and the strategic models. A database has been constructed for this purpose with the 390 positive conflicts of competence between the central government and the autonomous communities resolved by the TC from 1981 to 2017, which have been used to estimate various explanatory models of unanimous rulings. The results obtained show the importance of the legalist/federalist model when attempting to explain unanimity in the Court’s pronouncements, but they also offer evidence that there are other factors that also influence the level of agreement among TC justices, remarkably the ideological ones.
000129325 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/ECO2016-76506-C4-3-R
000129325 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
000129325 590__ $$a0.679$$b2019
000129325 591__ $$aLAW$$b109 / 154 = 0.708$$c2019$$dQ3$$eT3
000129325 591__ $$aECONOMICS$$b311 / 371 = 0.838$$c2019$$dQ4$$eT3
000129325 592__ $$a0.458$$b2019
000129325 593__ $$aLaw$$c2019$$dQ1
000129325 593__ $$aBusiness and International Management$$c2019$$dQ2
000129325 593__ $$aEconomics and Econometrics$$c2019$$dQ2
000129325 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000129325 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-1534-2970$$aRodrigo, F.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000129325 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-8555-973X$$aSanz-Arcega, E.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000129325 7102_ $$14008$$2225$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Estruc.Hª Econ.y Eco.Pb.$$cÁrea Economía Aplicada
000129325 773__ $$g48, 3 (2019), 305-330$$pEur. j. law econ.$$tEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND ECONOMICS$$x0929-1261
000129325 8564_ $$s256629$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/129325/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000129325 8564_ $$s1603700$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/129325/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000129325 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:129325$$particulos$$pdriver
000129325 951__ $$a2024-01-26-18:17:18
000129325 980__ $$aARTICLE