<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
<record>
  <controlfield tag="001">129450</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20231219145827.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ress.2018.07.032</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">sideral</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">107672</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ART-2018-107672</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Badía, F.G.</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">Universidad de Zaragoza</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-6651-3306</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Optimal replacement policy under a general failure and repair model: Minimal versus worse than old repair</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2018</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">We analyze the optimal replacement policy for a system subject to a general failure and repair model. Failures can be of one of two types: catastrophic or minor. The former leads to the replacement of the system, whereas minor failures are followed by repairs. The novelty of the proposed model is that, after repair, the system recovers the operational state but its condition is worse than that just prior to failure (worse than old). Undertrained operators or low quality spare parts explain this deficient maintenance. The corresponding failure process is based on the Generalized Pólya Process which presents both the minimal repair and the perfect repair as special cases. The system is replaced by a new one after the first catastrophic failure, and also undergoes two sorts of preventive maintenance based on age and after a predetermined number of minor failures whichever comes first. We derive the long-run average cost rate and study the optimal replacement policy. Some numerical examples illustrate the comparison between the as bad-as-old and the worse than old conditions.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="506" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Access copy available to the general public</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Unrestricted</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="9">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">by-nc-nd</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="590" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">4.039</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">2018</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="591" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">OPERATIONS RESEARCH &amp; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">11 / 84 = 0.131</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2018</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Q1</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">T1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="591" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">5 / 46 = 0.109</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2018</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Q1</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">T1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="592" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">1.944</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">2018</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="593" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Applied Mathematics</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2018</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Q1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="593" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2018</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Q1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="593" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2018</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">Q1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">info:eu-repo/semantics/article</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Berrade, M.D.</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">Universidad de Zaragoza</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-8035-5762</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Cha, J.H.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Lee, H.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">2007</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">265</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Universidad de Zaragoza</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Dpto. Métodos Estadísticos</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Área Estadís. Investig. Opera.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="g">180 (2018), 362-372</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">Reliab. eng. syst. saf.</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Reliability Engineering and System Safety</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0951-8320</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">652043</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/129450/files/texto_completo.pdf</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">Postprint</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">1022254</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/129450/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">icon</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">Postprint</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="o">oai:zaguan.unizar.es:129450</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">articulos</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">driver</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">2023-12-19-13:59:38</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ARTICLE</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
</collection>