<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
<record>
  <controlfield tag="001">129684</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20240104102233.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">10.5424/sjar/2004021-59</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="8" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">sideral</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">55120</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="037" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ART-2004-55120</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Chacón Pérez, G.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Validation of an EIA [enzyme immunoassay] technique for the determination of salivary cortisol in cattle</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2004</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This work involves the development and validation of an enzyme immunoassay technique (EIA) for the measurement of the cortisol concentration in cattle saliva. Saliva samples present several advantages over plasma samples in animal welfare studies. Saliva collection avoids venipuncture as a stress factor. Also, saliva components do not affect EIA as plasma components do. At present, there is no validated commercial method for saliva cortisol determination in cattle. Commercially available radioimmunoassay kits for human plasma (detection range: 10-100 ng ml -1 ) are not sensitive enough for animals with low concentrations of salivary cortisol (&lt; 4 ng ml -1 ). Thus, EIA is the method of choice in cattle. Sensitivity, specificity, precision and accuracy EIA tests showed this method to be suitable and reliable. The detection limit was found to be 0.024 ng ml -1 , representing an improvement on previously described techniques. Intra-assay and inter-assay variation coefficients were 1.47-7.30% and 2.40-9.78%, respectively. The recovery rates for cortisol added to saliva samples were 91.36-126.5%. Parallelism tests showed that saliva cortisol levels can be determined in cattle samples without extraction. The correlation between saliva and plasma cortisol was positive (r = 0.75) and the saliva/plasma cortisol ratio was around 10%. Therefore, saliva samples are a suitable alternative to plasma samples in bovine HPA (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal) axis evaluation</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="506" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Access copy available to the general public</subfield>
    <subfield code="f">Unrestricted</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="540" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="9">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">by</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">info:eu-repo/semantics/article</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">García Belenguer Laita, S.</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">Universidad de Zaragoza</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0001-5084-6555</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Illera del Portal, J.C.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Palacio Liesa, J.</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">Universidad de Zaragoza</subfield>
    <subfield code="0">(orcid)0000-0002-1581-3085</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="1">1009</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">617</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">Universidad de Zaragoza</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Dpto. Patología Animal</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Área Medicina y Cirugía Animal</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="g">2, 1 (2004), 45-51</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">Span. j. agric. res.</subfield>
    <subfield code="t">Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">1695-971X</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">49769</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/129684/files/texto_completo.pdf</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">Versión publicada</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="s">2608090</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/129684/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">icon</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">Versión publicada</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1="C" ind2="O">
    <subfield code="o">oai:zaguan.unizar.es:129684</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">articulos</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">driver</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">2024-01-04-09:09:10</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="980" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ARTICLE</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
</collection>