000129814 001__ 129814
000129814 005__ 20240912131721.0
000129814 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.22489/CinC.2022.340
000129814 0248_ $$2sideral$$a136106
000129814 037__ $$aART-2022-136106
000129814 041__ $$aeng
000129814 100__ $$aSales Bellés, Clara$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000129814 245__ $$aRight ventricular vs left bundle branch pacing-induced changes in ECG depolarization and repolarization
000129814 260__ $$c2022
000129814 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000129814 5203_ $$aPatients suffering from bradycardia are indicated for pacemaker implantation. Right ventricular pacing (RVP)has been conventionally used for this purpose, but it can increase the risk of atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Left
bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has been proposed as a new physiological pacing technique. The aim of this study was to compare changes induced by RVP and LBBAP in the ECG. 10-minute 12-lead ECG recordings were acquired at baseline and after pacemaker implantation from 83 patients (31 RVP, 52 LBBAP). Median beats were calculated for each patient at baseline and post-implantation states. ECG markers including QRS duration (dQRS)and area (aQRS) and heart rate-corrected QT (QTc) and Tpeak-to-Tend (Tpec) intervals were measured. dQRS and aQRS decreased significantly at post-implantation with respect to baseline, both being significantly lower for LBBAP than RVP after pacemaker implantation. QTc was significantly reduced at post-implantation for both pacing techniques with no differences between them. Tpec did not change either between states or techniques. In conclusion, LBBAP led to more synchronized ventricular depolarization, supporting potentially improved clinical outcomes with LBBAP as compared to RVP for anti-bradycardia therapy
000129814 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA-FSE/T39-20R$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/LMP94_21$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/PID2019-105674RB-I00$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/RYC2019-027420-I
000129814 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000129814 592__ $$a0.212$$b2022
000129814 593__ $$aComputer Science (miscellaneous)$$c2022
000129814 593__ $$aCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine$$c2022
000129814 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000129814 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-5935-9454$$aPalacios, Saúl$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000129814 700__ $$aMelero, Jorge$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000129814 700__ $$aJulián, Inés
000129814 700__ $$aRamos, Javier$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000129814 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-7503-3339$$aPablo Martínez, Juan$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000129814 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-3183-4107$$aMinchole, Ana$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000129814 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-1960-407X$$aPueyo, Esther$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000129814 7102_ $$11007$$2610$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Medicina, Psiqu. y Derm.$$cArea Medicina
000129814 7102_ $$15008$$2800$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Ingeniería Electrón.Com.$$cÁrea Teoría Señal y Comunicac.
000129814 773__ $$g49 (2022), [4 pp.]$$pComput. cardiol.$$tComputing in Cardiology$$x2325-8861
000129814 8564_ $$s1072540$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/129814/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000129814 8564_ $$s2650258$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/129814/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000129814 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:129814$$particulos$$pdriver
000129814 951__ $$a2024-09-12-13:15:39
000129814 980__ $$aARTICLE