000129876 001__ 129876
000129876 005__ 20241125101133.0
000129876 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.30682/nm2303g
000129876 0248_ $$2sideral$$a136194
000129876 037__ $$aART-2023-136194
000129876 041__ $$aeng
000129876 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-4905-3694$$aResano Ezcaray, María Helena$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000129876 245__ $$aExploring consumers’ beef preferences using a stated method approach: Disentangling differences throughout the value chain
000129876 260__ $$c2023
000129876 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000129876 5203_ $$aIt is increasingly important that the extensive livestock systems become more resilient and market orientated to face current challenges. But this can only be achieved by more interconnected supply chains where consumers’ expectations are understood and the benefits of the production systems are communicated to the final consumer. This paper focuses on an array of meat attributes and their role in consumers’ preferences, from both consumers’ own perspective and the opinions of other value chain agents. The former was studied with a consumers’ survey and a choice experiment, while the latter was investigated by the Delphi method. The study was carried out in a major beef consuming region in Spain, characterised by the presence of extensive cattle farming systems. Results reveal the existence of a niche market for more differentiated beef, where health qualities and local origin are particularly appealing. The ranking of preferences elicited through the rating-scale and the choice experiment are mostly consistent. We also find a certain degree of divergence between the agents' valuations, being wider with those placed farther from the consumer, as is the cattle farmer.
000129876 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/INIA/RTA2012-00084-C03-00
000129876 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000129876 590__ $$a1.2$$b2023
000129876 592__ $$a0.289$$b2023
000129876 591__ $$aAGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY$$b40 / 89 = 0.449$$c2023$$dQ2$$eT2
000129876 591__ $$aAGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY$$b26 / 39 = 0.667$$c2023$$dQ3$$eT3
000129876 593__ $$aAgricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)$$c2023$$dQ2
000129876 593__ $$aGeography, Planning and Development$$c2023$$dQ3
000129876 593__ $$aDevelopment$$c2023$$dQ3
000129876 593__ $$aAgronomy and Crop Science$$c2023$$dQ3
000129876 593__ $$aEconomics and Econometrics$$c2023$$dQ3
000129876 594__ $$a2.0$$b2023
000129876 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000129876 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-3817-1679$$aOlaizola, Ana María$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000129876 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-5470-7528$$aSanjuán, Ana Isabel
000129876 7102_ $$15011$$2235$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. CC.Agrar.y Medio Natural$$cÁrea Econom.Sociol.Polit.Agra.
000129876 773__ $$g22, 3 (2023), 127-143$$pNew Medit$$tNew Medit$$x1594-5685
000129876 8564_ $$s732221$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/129876/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000129876 8564_ $$s1825638$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/129876/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000129876 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:129876$$particulos$$pdriver
000129876 951__ $$a2024-11-22-11:59:44
000129876 980__ $$aARTICLE