Horticultural interventions may reduce adults’ depressive symptoms: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Resumen: We conducted a systematic review to examine the effect of horticultural interventions (e.g., planting or taking care of plants) on people's depressive symptoms as assessed by depression outcome measures. On January 19 of 2022, the databases MEDLINE (PubMed), PsycArticles (APA), SCOPUS (Elsevier), Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrails.gov were searched from inception. The decision to include or exclude studies in the full text, the data extraction, and the risk of bias assessment were performed by two researchers. We identified 20 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 998 participants; all adults), from nine different countries. Overall, we found evidence that some horticultural interventions plus usual care (i.e., continuing normal routine for healthy people or treatment for unhealthy ones) may reduce depressive symptoms more than usual care alone, with most studies suggesting a moderate (Hedges'g ≥ 0.5) or large effect (g ≥ 0.8). The percentage of participants who dropped out from any of the horticultural interventions ranged from 0% to 40% and only one study reported adverse events (i.e., fatigue and tiredness) related to the intervention. Except for one study, all studies had some risk of bias due to design limitations, such as lack of participants' blinding and/or a prespecified analysis plan. Our findings suggest that some horticultural interventions are effective and safe to use as a complementary strategy to reduce adults' depressive symptoms. More RCTs are needed to understand how specific participants and intervention characteristics can alter the effect of horticultural interventions on depressive symptoms.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102112
Año: 2023
Publicado en: JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY 91 (2023), 102112 [13 pp.]
ISSN: 0272-4944

Factor impacto JCR: 6.1 (2023)
Categ. JCR: PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY rank: 15 / 218 = 0.069 (2023) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES rank: 22 / 182 = 0.121 (2023) - Q1 - T1

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 10.6 - Applied Psychology (Q1) - Social Psychology (Q1)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 2.06 - Social Psychology (Q1) - Applied Psychology (Q1)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICIU/PGC2018-095502-B-I00
Tipo y forma: Article (PostPrint)
Área (Departamento): Área Psicología Social (Dpto. Psicología y Sociología)

Creative Commons You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.


Fecha de embargo : 2024-08-18
Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-07-31-09:46:32)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Articles



 Record created 2024-01-23, last modified 2024-07-31


Postprint:
 PDF
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)