000130190 001__ 130190
000130190 005__ 20241125101139.0
000130190 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1080/19419899.2023.2191606
000130190 0248_ $$2sideral$$a133590
000130190 037__ $$aART-2023-133590
000130190 041__ $$aeng
000130190 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-0045-7871$$aGómez-Torres, Piedad$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000130190 245__ $$aAcceptability and determinants of using male hormonal contraceptives: a systematic review from a gender perspective.
000130190 260__ $$c2023
000130190 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000130190 5203_ $$aThe development of male hormonal contraceptives (MHCs) is underway, and they may be available soon. Gender norms in family planning and predictors of use of MHCs need to be considered when addressing MHC promotion and adherence strategies. An evaluation of the acceptability factors of MHC methods in the population is carried out from a gender perspective. A systematic review following the PRISMA 2009 checklist has been performed. Articles indexed in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science and CUIDEN databases were included. Twenty-nine original articles were evaluated. Most evidence comes from Europe and North America. There is a high acceptability of MHCs in both sexes (reaching more than 70%). There are differences between countries and cultures. The main factors influencing willingness to use MHCs are: side effects; route of administration (MHC pill preferred by most men and injections by most women); frequency of administration (influenced by the previous factors); level of education and health behaviours; religion; perception of shared responsibility; perception of masculinity; and impaired sexual function/desire. Efficacy has not been sufficiently explored. Gender-dependent attitudes towards contraceptive responsibility need to be further explored, so that policies that favour equal reproductive rights can be formulated once MHCs are marketed.
000130190 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
000130190 590__ $$a2.4$$b2023
000130190 592__ $$a0.918$$b2023
000130190 591__ $$aPSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY$$b65 / 219 = 0.297$$c2023$$dQ2$$eT1
000130190 593__ $$aGender Studies$$c2023$$dQ1
000130190 593__ $$aHealth (social science)$$c2023$$dQ1
000130190 593__ $$aSocial Psychology$$c2023$$dQ2
000130190 593__ $$aApplied Psychology$$c2023$$dQ2
000130190 594__ $$a4.6$$b2023
000130190 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/review$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000130190 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-8399-130X$$aLucha-López, Ana C.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000130190 700__ $$aMartínez-Pérez, Guillermo Z.
000130190 700__ $$aSheridan, Taylor
000130190 700__ $$aVera Cruz, Germano
000130190 7102_ $$11006$$2255$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Fisiatría y Enfermería$$cÁrea Enfermería
000130190 773__ $$g14, 4 (2023), 689-719$$pPsychol. sex.$$tPsychology & Sexuality$$x1941-9899
000130190 8564_ $$s364968$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/130190/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint$$zinfo:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2024-03-28
000130190 8564_ $$s954447$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/130190/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint$$zinfo:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2024-03-28
000130190 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:130190$$particulos$$pdriver
000130190 951__ $$a2024-11-22-12:02:01
000130190 980__ $$aARTICLE