<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.6698</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Pérez-Palomares, Sara</dc:creator><dc:creator>Oliván-Blázquez, Bárbara</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pérez-Palomares, Ana</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gaspar-Calvo, Elena</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pérez-Benito, Marina</dc:creator><dc:creator>López-Lapeña, Elena</dc:creator><dc:creator>Torre Beldarraín, María Luisa de la</dc:creator><dc:creator>Magallón-Botaya, Rosa</dc:creator><dc:title>Contribution of dry needling to individualized physical therapy treatment of shoulder pain: A randomized clinical trial</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2017-97900</dc:identifier><dc:description>STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, parallel randomized clinical trial. BACKGROUND: Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) are implicated in shoulder pain and functional limitations. An intervention intended to treat MTrPs is dry needling. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effectiveness of dry needling in addition to evidence-based personalized physical therapy treatment in the treatment of shoulder pain. METHODS: One hundred twenty patients with nonspecific shoulder pain were randomly allocated into 2 parallel groups: (1) personalized, evidencebased physical therapy treatment; and (2) trigger point dry needling in addition to personalized, evidence-based physical therapy treatment. Patients were assessed at baseline, posttreatment, and 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome measure was pain assessed by a visual analog scale at 3 months, and secondary variables were joint range-of-motion limitations, Constant-Murley score for pain and function, and number of active MTrPs. Clinical efficacy was assessed using intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Of the 120 enrolled patients, 63 were randomly assigned to the control group and 57 to the intervention group. There were no significant differences in outcome between the 2 treatment groups. Both groups showed improvement over time. CONCLUSION: Dry needling did not offer benefits in addition to personalized, evidencebased physical therapy treatment for patients with nonspecific shoulder pain. Copyright</dc:description><dc:date>2017</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/130288</dc:source><dc:doi>10.2519/jospt.2017.6698</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/130288</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:130288</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/E22</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/FIS/PI07-90924</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/MTM2014-53340-P</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC &amp; SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY 47, 1 (2017), 11-20, B1-B9</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>