<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14589-9</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Serrano, A.B.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Díaz-Cambronero, O.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Melchor-Ripollés, J.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Abad-Gurumeta, A.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Ramírez-Rodríguez, J.M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Martínez-Ubieto, J.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sánchez-Merchante, M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Rodríguez, R.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Jordá, L.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Gil-Trujillo, S.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Cabellos-Olivares, M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bordonaba-Bosque, D.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Aldecoa, C.</dc:creator><dc:title>Neuromuscular blockade management and postoperative outcomes in enhanced recovery colorectal surgery: secondary analysis of POWER trial</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2021-123344</dc:identifier><dc:description>BACKGROUND: We evaluated the impact of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) management, monitoring and reversal on postoperative outcomes in colorectal surgical patients included in an enhanced recovery program. 
METHODS: We performed a predefined analysis in 2084 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery who participated in POWER study. We analyzed them for complications, length of hospital stay and mortality. Two groups were defined: 1) monitoring + reversal of the neuromuscular blockade (M+R) group: all patients receiving neuromuscular blockade monitoring plus reversal of it with any drug (neostigmine or sugammadex) were included; and 2) no monitoring nor reversal (noM+noR) group. In this group all the patients who did not receive monitoring and reversal of the neuromuscular blockade were allocated. 
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis found no statistically significant differences in moderate-severe complications (174 [25.7%] vs. 124 [27.1%]; P=0.607), length of hospital stay (10.8±11.1 vs. 11.0 ±12.6 days; P=0.683) and mortality (6 [0.9%] vs. 5 [1.1%]; P=0.840) between the group receiving optimal neuromuscular management (M+R) and the one did not receive it (noM+noR). Univariate analysis showed patients reversed with neostigmine died more than those reversed with sugammadex (3 [2.7%] vs. 3 [0.5%]; P=0.048). 
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest optimal neuromuscular blockade management in colorectal surgery is not associated with less moderate-severe complications, length of hospital stay or death during postoperative period in an enhanced recovery program. Neostigmine reversal seems to be linked to higher rate of mortality than sugammadex.</dc:description><dc:date>2021</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/130470</dc:source><dc:doi>10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14589-9</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/130470</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:130470</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>Minerva Anestesiologica 87, 1 (2021), 13-25</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>