000130566 001__ 130566 000130566 005__ 20240126184244.0 000130566 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.aap.2016.06.023 000130566 0248_ $$2sideral$$a95635 000130566 037__ $$aART-2016-95635 000130566 041__ $$aeng 000130566 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-6159-2554$$aCarús, L.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000130566 245__ $$aFeature-specific ski injuries in snow parks 000130566 260__ $$c2016 000130566 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted 000130566 5203_ $$aPrevious research suggests that snow park (SP) injuries are proportionally more frequent and more likely to be more severe than those sustained on traditional slopes. The aim of this study was to calculate skiers’ overall and feature-specific injury rates and determine potential risk factors for severe injury in an SP.This is a retrospective study conducted during the 2013/2014 winter season in the SP of a major winter resort located in the Spanish Pyrenees. Cases were skiers who suffered feature-related injuries in the SP. Denominator data consisted of the estimated total number of skier runs and the estimated total number of times each feature was used by a skier. Injury rates were calculated and logistic regression used to determine the feature-specific odds of injury.A total of 113 cases met the inclusion criteria. The overall injury rate was of 0.9 per 1000 skier runs. Rates of injury were highest for Big jumps (2.9/1000 uses) and lowest for Rainbow boxes (0.1/1000 uses). Compared with Boxes, there were increased odds of severe injury versus minor injury for C-rails (OR 9.1; 95% CI 0.6–13.18), Half-pipe (OR 4.5; 95% CI 0.3–6.27) and Big jumps (OR 3.0; 95% CI 0.3–3.53). Higher feature-specific ski injury rates and increased odds of injury were associated with features that require a very clean technique or promote aerial maneuvers and result in a larger drop to the ground. 000130566 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ 000130566 590__ $$a2.685$$b2016 000130566 591__ $$aERGONOMICS$$b2 / 16 = 0.125$$c2016$$dQ1$$eT1 000130566 591__ $$aTRANSPORTATION$$b5 / 33 = 0.152$$c2016$$dQ1$$eT1 000130566 591__ $$aSOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY$$b3 / 96 = 0.031$$c2016$$dQ1$$eT1 000130566 591__ $$aPUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH$$b19 / 157 = 0.121$$c2016$$dQ1$$eT1 000130566 592__ $$a1.586$$b2016 000130566 593__ $$aHuman Factors and Ergonomics$$c2016$$dQ1 000130566 593__ $$aSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality$$c2016$$dQ1 000130566 593__ $$aPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health$$c2016$$dQ1 000130566 593__ $$aLaw$$c2016$$dQ1 000130566 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion 000130566 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-1801-2144$$aEscorihuela, M.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000130566 7102_ $$14012$$2650$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Direcc.Organiza.Empresas$$cÁrea Organización de Empresas 000130566 7102_ $$14008$$2623$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Estruc.Hª Econ.y Eco.Pb.$$cÁrea Métodos Cuant.Econ.Empres 000130566 773__ $$g95 (2016), 86-90$$pAccident anal. prev.$$tACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION$$x0001-4575 000130566 8564_ $$s408215$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/130566/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint 000130566 8564_ $$s1359040$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/130566/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint 000130566 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:130566$$particulos$$pdriver 000130566 951__ $$a2024-01-26-18:10:31 000130566 980__ $$aARTICLE