000131092 001__ 131092
000131092 005__ 20240319080958.0
000131092 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1080/08927936.2021.2012341
000131092 0248_ $$2sideral$$a127960
000131092 037__ $$aART-2022-127960
000131092 041__ $$aeng
000131092 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-7723-5172$$aBernuz Beneitez, María José$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000131092 245__ $$aPublic opinion about punishment for animal abuse in Spain: animal attributes as predictors of attitudes toward penalties
000131092 260__ $$c2022
000131092 5203_ $$aNot all animals are perceived in the same way given the types of crimes of abuse and neglect that are included in the Spanish Criminal Code and the penalties for such crimes. The aim of this study was to assess public opinion (based on sex, age, location, pet ownership) on issues related to animal attributes (based on animals’ rights, whether they are considered sentient beings, and the responsibilities of humans toward them), the importance given to penalizing animal abuse, and which authority is considered the most appropriate for resolving such cases. A questionnaire based on a Likert-type scale attitude assessment model was responded to by 1,473 individuals (40.6% male; 59.5% female). In addition to demographic characteristics, seven statements were included to evaluate a person’s perception of the capacity of animals to feel pain and to suffer, and the animal's status within the family sphere. Three statements were designed to quantify respondents’ perceptions of punishment based on the context in which the abuse occurs. Four statements measured respondents’ perceptions of the role of a judge and the role of a mediator in penalizing animal abuse. The last section of the questionnaire included a question on the type of penalty that is appropriate for punishing those convicted of animal abuse. The study confirmed that humans differentiate animals based on how emotionally close to humans is the animal with which we form an attachment. In addition, the responses of women, young persons, urban dwellers, and pet owners were more sensitive to an animal's position in society. Respondents expressed greater agreement with fines rather than prison sentences as a punishment for animal abuse.
000131092 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/RTI2018-095843-B-I00
000131092 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000131092 590__ $$a1.6$$b2022
000131092 591__ $$aVETERINARY SCIENCES$$b62 / 144 = 0.431$$c2022$$dQ2$$eT2
000131092 591__ $$aSOCIOLOGY$$b94 / 149 = 0.631$$c2022$$dQ3$$eT2
000131092 592__ $$a0.486$$b2022
000131092 593__ $$aAnthropology$$c2022$$dQ1
000131092 593__ $$aVeterinary (miscellaneous)$$c2022$$dQ2
000131092 593__ $$aSociology and Political Science$$c2022$$dQ2
000131092 593__ $$aAnimal Science and Zoology$$c2022$$dQ2
000131092 593__ $$aEducation$$c2022$$dQ2
000131092 594__ $$a3.6$$b2022
000131092 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000131092 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-6106-2577$$aMaría Levrino, Gustavo$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000131092 7102_ $$12008$$2700$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Produc.Animal Cienc.Ali.$$cÁrea Producción Animal
000131092 7102_ $$14010$$2381$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Dcho.Pe.,Filos.D.e Hª D.$$cÁrea Filosofía del Derecho
000131092 773__ $$g35, 4 (2022), 559-576$$pAnthrozoös$$tANTHROZOOS$$x0892-7936
000131092 8564_ $$s1591734$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/131092/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000131092 8564_ $$s986732$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/131092/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000131092 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:131092$$particulos$$pdriver
000131092 951__ $$a2024-03-18-13:53:26
000131092 980__ $$aARTICLE