Exercise-induced hypoalgesia with end-stage knee osteoarthritis during different blood flow restriction levels: Sham-controlled crossover study
Resumen: Background: Blood flow restriction (BFR) training could be a valuable treatment to induce exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. However, the use of BFR in these patients is poorly explored and there is no evidence about the training dosage needed. Objective: To evaluate the effect of resistance training protocols with different occlusion levels of blood flow restriction (BFR) on EIH in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Design: Crossover study. Setting: University physical exercise laboratory. Participants: 26 adults with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Interventions: Patients performed four sets (30, 15, 15, and 15 repetitions) separated by 1-minute rests of three protocols/sessions of low-load (30% one-repetition-maximum) seated knee extensions with elastic bands and BFR: placebo (sham BFR), BFR at 40% arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) and BFR at 80% AOP. Main Outcome Measures: Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPT) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) collected before, immediately after session, and after 10 minutes. Results: No differences in EIH were found between the different levels of BFR. However, 80% AOP protocol worsened VAS scores immediately (mean difference [MD]: −21.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] −33.9 to −8.5) while improving PPT immediately (MD affected limb: −.6 [95% CI −1.1 to −.2]); contralateral: −.6 (95% CI −1.0 to −.2]) and at 10 minutes (MD affected limb: −.6 [95% CI) −1.2 to −.1]; contralateral: −.7 [95% CI −1.1 to −.2]; and forearm: −.5 [95% CI −.9 to −.05]) post-exercise compared to baseline. Conclusions: There is no EIH difference after using different occlusion levels. EIH is modulated by pain-related psychological constructs and self-perceived health status.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.13076
Año: 2023
Publicado en: PM & R 15, 12 (2023), 1565-1573
ISSN: 1934-1482

Factor impacto JCR: 2.2 (2023)
Categ. JCR: REHABILITATION rank: 29 / 170 = 0.171 (2023) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: SPORT SCIENCES rank: 46 / 127 = 0.362 (2023) - Q2 - T2

Factor impacto CITESCORE: 4.3 - Rehabilitation (Q1) - Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (Q1) - Neurology (clinical) (Q2) - Neurology (Q3)

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 0.688 - Rehabilitation (Q1) - Medicine (miscellaneous) (Q2) - Neurology (clinical) (Q2) - Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (Q2) - Neurology (Q3) - Sports Science (Q3)

Tipo y forma: Artículo (PostPrint)

Derechos Reservados Derechos reservados por el editor de la revista


Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-11-22-12:09:52)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos



 Registro creado el 2024-02-19, última modificación el 2024-11-25


Postprint:
 PDF
Valore este documento:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Sin ninguna reseña)