000132112 001__ 132112
000132112 005__ 20240319081012.0
000132112 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1080/13545701.2022.2078852
000132112 0248_ $$2sideral$$a130144
000132112 037__ $$aART-2022-130144
000132112 041__ $$aeng
000132112 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-1944-4790$$aMarcén, Miriam$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000132112 245__ $$aGender division of household labor in the United States: how does culture operate?
000132112 260__ $$c2022
000132112 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000132112 5203_ $$aThis article examines the ways in which culture plays a role in the gender division of household labor. To explore this issue, the study uses data on early-arrival first- and second-generation immigrants living in the United States who have a married/unmarried partner present in the household. Because all of these individuals have grown up under the same laws, institutions, and economic conditions that prevail in the US, the differences between them in the gender division of housework may be attributed to cultural differences in their countries of ancestry. The study finds that the stronger the culture of gender equality in the country of ancestry, the greater the equality in immigrants’ current division of housework. This result is maintained when considering both housework and childcare as household labor. This work is extended by examining how culture operates and is transmitted, and whether culture may influence the work–life balance. HIGHLIGHTS Cultural norms in the country of origin determine allocation of household tasks for immigrants in the host country. More gender-equal norms are associated with a lower gender gap in housework time. Culture affects how and when housework is performed in family life, impacting couples’ work–life balance. Policies aimed at transforming gender norms can help to achieve gender equality. © 2022 IAFFE.
000132112 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/S32-20R$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/PID2020-114354RA-I00
000132112 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/
000132112 590__ $$a4.6$$b2022
000132112 591__ $$aWOMENS STUDIES$$b4 / 45 = 0.089$$c2022$$dQ1$$eT1
000132112 591__ $$aECONOMICS$$b66 / 380 = 0.174$$c2022$$dQ1$$eT1
000132112 592__ $$a1.534$$b2022
000132112 593__ $$aArts and Humanities (miscellaneous)$$c2022$$dQ1
000132112 593__ $$aGender Studies$$c2022$$dQ1
000132112 593__ $$aEconomics and Econometrics$$c2022$$dQ1
000132112 593__ $$aBusiness, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)$$c2022$$dQ1
000132112 594__ $$a5.4$$b2022
000132112 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000132112 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-9957-6613$$aMorales, Marina$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000132112 7102_ $$14000$$2415$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Análisis Económico$$cÁrea Fund. Análisis Económico
000132112 773__ $$g28, 4 (2022), 166-193$$pFem. econ.$$tFEMINIST ECONOMICS$$x1354-5701
000132112 8564_ $$s1370249$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/132112/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000132112 8564_ $$s892465$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/132112/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000132112 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:132112$$particulos$$pdriver
000132112 951__ $$a2024-03-18-15:14:31
000132112 980__ $$aARTICLE