000133060 001__ 133060
000133060 005__ 20240322124129.0
000133060 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1080/02646838.2021.1921716
000133060 0248_ $$2sideral$$a126670
000133060 037__ $$aART-2022-126670
000133060 041__ $$aeng
000133060 100__ $$aLasheras, Gracia
000133060 245__ $$aMother-infant bonding screening in a sample of postpartum women: comparison between online vs offline format
000133060 260__ $$c2022
000133060 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000133060 5203_ $$aAims: We aim to study the the reliability and factorial structure of the Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire (PBQ)administered through two different formats, offline (paper-and-pencil) and online. We also compared clinical, obstetrical, reproductive, and psychopathological variables related to poor mother infant bonding (MIB). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1, 269 mothers. The offline group included 812 women who attended a 40-day postpartum clinical appointment. The online group consisted of 457 women recruited during admission for delivery who volunteered to carry out the online protocol 40 days postpartum. All the participants individually completed the PBQ, the Edinburg Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and other clinical and sociodemographic variables. Results: The 4-factor solution proposed in the PBQ and its Spanish validation showed good model fit for both samples. Online participants reported higher levels of stress, depressive symptoms, and poor bonding, specifically on PBQ scores and the Rejection and Anger subscales. No differences were found in both samples regarding the type of statistical associations between PBQ and sociodemographic, reproductive, obstetric and psychological outcomes. Conclusion: Online assessment may be an appropriate option for detecting possible alterations in MIB due to the reduction of desirability bias, the increased perception of anonymity, and being a more cost-effective method.
000133060 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/S31-20D
000133060 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/
000133060 590__ $$a2.5$$b2022
000133060 591__ $$aPSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY$$b67 / 147 = 0.456$$c2022$$dQ2$$eT2
000133060 592__ $$a0.873$$b2022
000133060 593__ $$aObstetrics and Gynecology$$c2022$$dQ1
000133060 593__ $$aReproductive Medicine$$c2022$$dQ1
000133060 593__ $$aPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health$$c2022$$dQ1
000133060 593__ $$aPsychology (miscellaneous)$$c2022$$dQ2
000133060 594__ $$a5.5$$b2022
000133060 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000133060 700__ $$aFarré-Sender, Borja
000133060 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-7293-318X$$aOsma, Jorge$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000133060 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-2082-8115$$aMartínez-Borba, Verónica
000133060 700__ $$aMestre-Bach, Gemma
000133060 7102_ $$14009$$2680$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Person.Eval.Trat.Psicoló.
000133060 773__ $$g40, 5 (2022), 500-515$$pJ. reprod. infant psychol.$$tJOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY$$x0264-6838
000133060 8564_ $$s891503$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/133060/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000133060 8564_ $$s955824$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/133060/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000133060 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:133060$$particulos$$pdriver
000133060 951__ $$a2024-03-22-09:45:37
000133060 980__ $$aARTICLE