000133157 001__ 133157
000133157 005__ 20240322124130.0
000133157 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/ijerph18115991
000133157 0248_ $$2sideral$$a137797
000133157 037__ $$aART-2021-137797
000133157 041__ $$aeng
000133157 100__ $$aVillegas, Francisco
000133157 245__ $$aCharacterizing Breakthrough Cancer Pain Using Ecological Momentary Assessment with a Smartphone App: Feasibility and Clinical Findings
000133157 260__ $$c2021
000133157 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000133157 5203_ $$aBackground: mobile applications (apps) facilitate cancer pain ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and provide more reliable data than retrospective monitoring. The aims of this study are (a) to describe the status of persons with cancer pain when assessed ecologically, (b) to analyze the utility of clinical alarms integrated into the app, and (c) to test the feasibility of implementing an app for daily oncological pain monitoring. Methods: in this feasibility study, 21 patients (mean age = 56.95 years, SD = 10.53, 81.0% men) responded to an app-based evaluation of physical status (baseline and breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP)) and mental health variables (fatigue, mood, and coping) daily during 30 days. Results: cancer pain characterization with the app was similar to data from the literature using retrospective assessments in terms of BTcP duration and perceived medication effectiveness. However, BTcP was less frequent when evaluated ecologically. Pain, fatigue, and mood were comparable in the morning and evening. Passive coping strategies were the most employed daily. Clinical alarms appear to be useful to detect and address adverse events. App implementation was feasible and acceptable. Conclusion: apps reduce recall bias and facilitate a rapid response to adverse events in oncological care. Future efforts should be addressed to integrate EMA and ecological momentary interventions to facilitate pain self-management via apps.
000133157 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000133157 590__ $$a4.614$$b2021
000133157 591__ $$aPUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH$$b45 / 182 = 0.247$$c2021$$dQ1$$eT1
000133157 591__ $$aENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES$$b100 / 279 = 0.358$$c2021$$dQ2$$eT2
000133157 591__ $$aPUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH$$b71 / 210 = 0.338$$c2021$$dQ2$$eT2
000133157 592__ $$a0.814$$b2021
000133157 593__ $$aPollution$$c2021$$dQ1
000133157 593__ $$aHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis$$c2021$$dQ1
000133157 594__ $$a4.5$$b2021
000133157 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000133157 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-2082-8115$$aMartínez-Borba, Verónica
000133157 700__ $$aSuso-Ribera, Carlos
000133157 700__ $$aCastilla, Diana
000133157 700__ $$aZaragoza, Irene
000133157 700__ $$aGarcía-Palacios, Azucena
000133157 700__ $$aFerrer, Carlos
000133157 773__ $$g18, 11 (2021), 5991 [21 pp.]$$pInt. j. environ. res. public health$$tInternational journal of environmental research and public health$$x1661-7827
000133157 8564_ $$s1050933$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/133157/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000133157 8564_ $$s2771622$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/133157/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000133157 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:133157$$particulos$$pdriver
000133157 951__ $$a2024-03-22-09:48:26
000133157 980__ $$aARTICLE