000133437 001__ 133437
000133437 005__ 20250908131410.0
000133437 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.17583/rimcis.13747
000133437 0248_ $$2sideral$$a138114
000133437 037__ $$aART-2024-138114
000133437 041__ $$aeng
000133437 100__ $$aGutiérrez-Fernández, Nerea
000133437 245__ $$aOptimal methodology for addressing the social impact component within project proposals and curriculum vitae
000133437 260__ $$c2024
000133437 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000133437 5203_ $$aThe scientific and grey literature have highlighted the increasing relevance of the social impact of research. More and more, funding and evaluation agencies are using social impact as a required criterion when assessing the excellence of research proposals and researchers’ CV. However, research has identified elemental confusions about what social impact is in most research proposals, CVs and consulting companies. Based on the communicative methodology which co-led the creation and elaboration of the priorities of social impact and co-creation, the study presented in this paper includes the knowledge co-created along years of dialogues with scientists and citizens and a documentary analysis of four official documents on social impact and researcher evaluation. Results identify the first scientific six guidelines to date on how to include researchers’ actual or potential social impact in the research proposals and CVs1) To avoid confusing social impact with dissemination or transference; 2) To identify the concrete social impact of the specific scientific knowledge created by the authors; 3) To precise the concrete indicators of each social impact; 4) To specify the concrete sources; 5) To identify the interactive social impact; 6) To include the potential social impact.
000133437 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/
000133437 592__ $$a0.31$$b2024
000133437 593__ $$aHistory$$c2024$$dQ1
000133437 593__ $$aPhilosophy$$c2024$$dQ1
000133437 593__ $$aSocial Sciences (miscellaneous)$$c2024$$dQ2
000133437 593__ $$aEconomics and Econometrics$$c2024$$dQ3
000133437 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000133437 700__ $$aZubiri-Esnaola, Harkaitz
000133437 700__ $$aLópez de Aguileta, Garazi
000133437 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-0937-4861$$aElboj-Saso, Carmen$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000133437 700__ $$aSoler-Gallart, Marta
000133437 700__ $$aFlecha, Ramón
000133437 7102_ $$14009$$2775$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Sociología
000133437 773__ $$g13, 1 (2024), 58–74$$pRIMCIS$$tRIMCIS$$x2014-3680
000133437 8564_ $$s345406$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/133437/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000133437 8564_ $$s2127889$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/133437/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000133437 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:133437$$particulos$$pdriver
000133437 951__ $$a2025-09-08-12:50:19
000133437 980__ $$aARTICLE