<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1007/s12671-024-02319-4</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>D’Amico, Francesco</dc:creator><dc:creator>Navarrete, Jaime</dc:creator><dc:creator>Montero-Marín, Jesús</dc:creator><dc:creator>Cardeñosa-Valera, Eugenia</dc:creator><dc:creator>Navarro-Gil, Mayte</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pérez-Aranda, Adrián</dc:creator><dc:creator>López-del-Hoyo, Yolanda</dc:creator><dc:creator>Collado-Navarro, Carlos</dc:creator><dc:creator>García-Campayo, Javier</dc:creator><dc:creator>Luciano, Juan V.</dc:creator><dc:title>Cost-Utility of Attachment-Based Compassion Therapy (ABCT) and Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) in the Management of Depressive, Anxious, and Adjustment Disorders in Mental Health Settings: Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomized Controlled Trial</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2024-138177</dc:identifier><dc:description>Objectives: The main objective of this paper was to examine the cost-utility of attachment-based compassion therapy (ABCT) compared to Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) and treatment-as-usual (TAU) on patients with depressive and/or anxious disorder, or adjustment disorder with depressive and/or anxious symptomatology in terms of effects on quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as well as healthcare costs from a public healthcare system perspective.
Method: A 6-month randomized controlled trial was conducted. Ninety Spanish patients with mental disorders (depressive, anxious, or adjustment disorders) received 8 weekly group sessions of TAU + ABCT, TAU + MBSR, or TAU alone. Data collection took place at pre- and 6-month follow-up. Cost-utility of the two treatment groups (ABCT vs MBSR vs TAU) was compared by examining treatment outcomes in terms of QALYs (obtained with the EQ-5D-3L) and healthcare costs (data about service use obtained with the Client Service Receipt Inventory).            
Results: Both MBSR and ABCT were more efficient than TAU alone, although the results did not reach statistical significance. Compared to ABCT, MBSR produced an increase both in terms of costs (€53.69, 95% CI [− 571.27 to 513.14]) and effects (0.004 QALYs, 95% CI [− 0.031 to 0.049]); ICUR = €13,422.50/QALY). Both interventions significantly reduced the number of visits to general practice compared to TAU.            
Conclusions: This study has contributed to the evidence base of mindfulness- and compassion-based programs and provided promising information about the cost-utility of MBSR for patients with emotional disorders. However, the small sample size and short follow-up period limit the generalizability of the findings.
Preregistration Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT03425487</dc:description><dc:date>2024</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/134639</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1007/s12671-024-02319-4</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/134639</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:134639</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ISCIII/CIBERESP/CB22-02-00052</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ISCIII/CP21-00080</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ISCIII-RICAPPS/RD21-0016-0005</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>Mindfulness 15, 3 (2024), 11 pp.</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by</dc:rights><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>