000135719 001__ 135719
000135719 005__ 20240614091947.0
000135719 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.10.005
000135719 0248_ $$2sideral$$a126783
000135719 037__ $$aART-2021-126783
000135719 041__ $$aeng
000135719 100__ $$aSastre-Buades, A.
000135719 245__ $$aDecision-making in suicidal behavior: A systematic review and meta-analysis
000135719 260__ $$c2021
000135719 5203_ $$aImpaired decision-making (DM) is well-known in suicidal behavior (SB). We aimed to review the evidence on DM and its mediating factors in SB and perform a meta-analysis on DM assessed using the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). We conducted a search on databases of papers published on DM and SB up to 2020: 46 studies were included in the systematic review, and 18 in the meta-analysis. For meta-analysis, we compared DM performance between suicide attempters (SAs) and patients (PCs) or healthy controls (HCs). The systematic review showed that SAs have greater difficulties in all DM domains. The meta-analysis found worse IGT performance among SAs in comparison with PCs and HCs. A meta-regression did not find differences for age, gender, psychiatric disorder, and clinical status. Our findings indicate that SAs exhibited deficits in DM under conditions of risk though not ambiguity. Worse DM was independent of age, gender, psychiatric disorder, and suggested that DM impairment could be considered a cognitive trait of suicidal vulnerability, a risk factor and an attribute of SAs.
000135719 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ESF-ERDF/PEJD-2018-PRE-SAL-8417$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ISCIII/PI20-01555$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MCIU/TEC2017-92552-EXP$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/RTI2018-099655-B-I00$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/TEC2015-69868-C2-1-R
000135719 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000135719 590__ $$a9.052$$b2021
000135719 591__ $$aNEUROSCIENCES$$b27 / 275 = 0.098$$c2021$$dQ1$$eT1
000135719 591__ $$aBEHAVIORAL SCIENCES$$b3 / 53 = 0.057$$c2021$$dQ1$$eT1
000135719 592__ $$a2.66$$b2021
000135719 593__ $$aCognitive Neuroscience$$c2021$$dQ1
000135719 593__ $$aBehavioral Neuroscience$$c2021$$dQ1
000135719 594__ $$a12.8$$b2021
000135719 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000135719 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-0633-2810$$aAlacreu-Crespo, A.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000135719 700__ $$aCourtet, P.
000135719 700__ $$aBaca-Garcia, E.
000135719 700__ $$aBarrigon, M.L.
000135719 7102_ $$14009$$2680$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Person.Eval.Trat.Psicoló.
000135719 773__ $$g131 (2021), 642-662$$pNeurosci. biobehav. rev.$$tNEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS$$x0149-7634
000135719 8564_ $$s2949953$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/135719/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000135719 8564_ $$s2246838$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/135719/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000135719 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:135719$$particulos$$pdriver
000135719 951__ $$a2024-06-14-08:58:40
000135719 980__ $$aARTICLE