000136015 001__ 136015
000136015 005__ 20240704095850.0
000136015 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108823
000136015 0248_ $$2sideral$$a139018
000136015 037__ $$aART-2024-139018
000136015 041__ $$aeng
000136015 100__ $$aPérez, Vanesa
000136015 245__ $$aEEG frequency bands in subjective cognitive decline: A systematic review of resting state studies
000136015 260__ $$c2024
000136015 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000136015 5203_ $$aAs the older population continues to expand, there is a growing prevalence of individuals who experience subjective cognitive decline (SCD), characterized by self-reported failures in cognitive function and an increased risk of cognitive impairment. Recognizing that preventive interventions are typically more effective in preclinical stages, current research endeavors to focus on identifying early biological markers of SCD using resting-state electroencephalogram (rsEEG) methods. To do so, a systematic literature review covering the past 20 years was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, in order to consolidate findings on rsEEG frequency bands in individuals with SCD. Pubmed and Web of Science databases were searched for rsEEG studies of people with SCD. Quality assessments were completed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A total of 564 articles published from December 2003 to December 2023 were reviewed, and significant aspects of these papers were analyzed to provide a general overview of the research on this technique. After removing unrelated articles, nine articles were selected for the present study. The review emphasizes patterns in frequency band activity, revealing that individuals classified as SCD exhibited increased theta power than healthy controls, but decreased than MCI. However, findings for the alpha, delta, and beta bands were inconsistent, demonstrating variability across studies and highlighting the need for further research. Although the rsEEG of frequency bands emerges as a promising early biomarker, there is a noteworthy need to establish uniform standards and consistent measurement approaches in order to ensure the reliability and comparability of the results obtained in the research.
000136015 536__ $$9Info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/AEI/PID2020-119406GB-I00$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/S31-23R
000136015 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
000136015 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/review$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000136015 700__ $$aDuque, Aránzazu
000136015 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-3920-1099$$aHidalgo, Vanesa$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000136015 700__ $$aSalvador, Alicia
000136015 7102_ $$14009$$2725$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Psicobiología
000136015 773__ $$g191 (2024), 108823 [8 pp.]$$pBiol. psychol.$$tBIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY$$x0301-0511
000136015 8564_ $$s682891$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/136015/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000136015 8564_ $$s2545601$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/136015/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000136015 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:136015$$particulos$$pdriver
000136015 951__ $$a2024-07-04-08:00:11
000136015 980__ $$aARTICLE