The efficacy and pattern of use of a computer-assisted programme for the treatment of anxiety: A naturalistic study using mixed methods in primary care in Spain
Resumen: Background
Naturalistic studies to assess the efficacy and pattern of use of computer-delivered psychotherapy programmes in real daily clinical conditions are infrequent. Anxiety disorders are the most common mental disorders, and many of them do not receive adequate management, especially in primary care settings. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of an internet-delivered programme for anxiety in primary care.
Methods
Multicentre, naturalistic study. Patients with generalised anxiety disorder were recruited (N=229). The generalised anxiety disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7) was the only outcome measured. Qualitative methods were used to analyse patient–therapist interactions.
Results
Only 13.5% of patients completed the programme. Analysis per intent-to-treat using Last Observation Carried Forward showed a significant GAD-7 decrease post-treatment (−2.17: SD=4.77; p=0.001) (Cohen׳s d=0.43) with a correlation between the number of sessions and decrease in anxiety (Rho=−0.34, p=0.001). The analysis per protocol showed significantly decreased GAD-7 (−4.13; SD=6.82; p=0.002) (d=0.80). Withdrawal was related to low programme friendliness, lack of a partner, and higher education. Only 17.47% of the patients consulted their therapists. Facilitators were patient demand for information and sufficient time. Barriers were lack of motivation and lack of connection with the programme.
Limitations
The main limitations of this study included the use of an open trial design, the lack of follow-up, and the inclusion of only one outcome (GAD-7).
Conclusions
To our knowledge, this is the first study with computer-delivered psychotherapy (CDP) on GAD. CDP for anxiety is efficacious in naturalistic environments. Specific facilitators and barriers should be considered.

Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.060
Año: 2015
Publicado en: Journal of Affective Disorders 175 (2015), 184-191
ISSN: 0165-0327

Factor impacto JCR: 3.57 (2015)
Categ. JCR: CLINICAL NEUROLOGY rank: 45 / 192 = 0.234 (2015) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: PSYCHIATRY rank: 22 / 139 = 0.158 (2015) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: PSYCHIATRY rank: 37 / 142 = 0.261 (2015) - Q2 - T1

Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.945 - Psychiatry and Mental Health (Q1) - Clinical Psychology (Q1)

Tipo y forma: Artículo (Versión definitiva)
Área (Departamento): Área Tecnología Electrónica (Dpto. Ingeniería Electrón.Com.)
Área (Departamento): Área Psicología Básica (Dpto. Psicología y Sociología)
Área (Departamento): Estudios Propios Dpto.M.Ps.y D (Estudios propios)
Área (Departamento): Area Psiquiatría (Dpto. Medicina, Psiqu. y Derm.)


Derechos Reservados Derechos reservados por el editor de la revista


Exportado de SIDERAL (2024-09-12-13:05:01)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos



 Registro creado el 2024-09-12, última modificación el 2024-09-12


Versión publicada:
 PDF
Valore este documento:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Sin ninguna reseña)