000144923 001__ 144923
000144923 005__ 20240920135617.0
000144923 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/land13081162
000144923 0248_ $$2sideral$$a139754
000144923 037__ $$aART-2024-139754
000144923 041__ $$aeng
000144923 100__ $$aLiu, Zhaoyang
000144923 245__ $$aResearch on the Interaction Mechanism between Land System Reform and Rural Population Flow: Europe (Taking Spain as an Example) and China
000144923 260__ $$c2024
000144923 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000144923 5203_ $$aThis paper examines the interaction between land policies and rural labor migration in China and Europe, highlighting how land reforms guide labor mobility and their impacts on land and social structures. In China, the Household Contract Responsibility System and land transfer policies have facilitated agricultural scale expansion and the urbanization of the rural labor force. Homestead reforms have further enhanced farmers’ asset liquidity. In Europe, using Spain as a case study, EU agricultural policies have spurred agricultural modernization, economic diversification, and intensive land use. These advancements benefitted from a mature land transfer market and increased non-agricultural employment opportunities. Both China and Europe face challenges of population aging and rural depopulation, necessitating improvements in land use efficiency, the balance of the scale, and the protection of farmers’ rights and interests. Europe addresses labor shortages through technology, mechanization, and cooperatives, while China employs land trusteeship, transfer platforms, and the “three rights separation” system to combat land abandonment and labor shortages. Future research should strengthen comparative studies between China and Europe, quantify interactive relationships, consider the impact of transnational labor mobility under globalization, explore policy innovations, and foster international cooperation to address demographic changes and agricultural labor shortages. Additionally, promoting sustainable land use and farmers’ rights, equalizing urban–rural public services, enhancing education and training, and improving the social security system are crucial for integrated urban–rural development.
000144923 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000144923 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000144923 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-5282-1930$$aEsteban Rodríguez, Samuel$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000144923 7102_ $$13006$$2435$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Geograf. Ordenac.Territ.$$cÁrea Geografía Humana
000144923 773__ $$g13, 8 (2024), 1162 [19 pp.]$$pLand (Basel)$$tLand$$x2073-445X
000144923 8564_ $$s2475443$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/144923/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000144923 8564_ $$s2636516$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/144923/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000144923 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:144923$$particulos$$pdriver
000144923 951__ $$a2024-09-20-13:00:38
000144923 980__ $$aARTICLE