000145333 001__ 145333
000145333 005__ 20241030085551.0
000145333 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.7480/iphs.2018.1.2724
000145333 0248_ $$2sideral$$a140245
000145333 037__ $$aART-2018-140245
000145333 041__ $$aeng
000145333 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-3145-377X$$aDíez, Carmen$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000145333 245__ $$aSuperblocks, neighbourhood units and residential islands as fragments of the collage city
000145333 260__ $$c2018
000145333 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000145333 5203_ $$aIn the intense debate that surrounds modernist housing estates in Europe there is a common argument: the contrast between the high quality of urban spaces in the compact traditional city and the low quality of new mass housing developments. In our opinion, the comparison should be made not with the traditional city but with the remaining peripheral landscape. The question is: do those ‘fragments’ of the modern ‘collage city’ that float between infrastructures and urban voids have greater or worse urban quality than the so-called ‘ordinary peripheries’? In this regard, determining the level of isolation from or integration into the immediate urban tissue is a key issue. The aim of this paper is to study eight housing estates in four cities (Rome, Milan, Madrid, Barcelona) and analyse how these ‘fragments’ developed in regard to their immediate urban context. How were they designed and with what specific features, compared to their European counterparts? What role and impact did urban planning and projects have in their fragmentary development? What conclusions can we draw comparing these quartieri and polígonos fifty years later? What are the values and weaknesses of those ‘fragments’ in comparison with the urban tissues of the surrounding ‘ordinary peripheries’?
000145333 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/T44-17R$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MEC/FPU16-06737$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/BES2015-072536$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/BIA2014-60059-R
000145333 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000145333 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000145333 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-1950-3084$$aMonclús, Javier$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000145333 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-5719-8375$$aEzquerra, Isabel$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000145333 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-1672-4965$$aGarcía, Sergio$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000145333 7102_ $$15010$$2100$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bUnidad Predepartam. Arquitect.$$cÁrea Composición Arquitectónic
000145333 7102_ $$15010$$2815$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bUnidad Predepartam. Arquitect.$$cÁrea Urbanística y Ord.Territ.
000145333 773__ $$g18, 1 (2018), 739-750$$pInt. plan. hist. soc. proc.$$tInternational planning history society proceedings$$x2468-6948
000145333 8564_ $$s854737$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/145333/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000145333 8564_ $$s2625836$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/145333/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000145333 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:145333$$particulos$$pdriver
000145333 951__ $$a2024-10-30-08:53:10
000145333 980__ $$aARTICLE