000145578 001__ 145578
000145578 005__ 20241108105822.0
000145578 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/vision8030057
000145578 0248_ $$2sideral$$a140399
000145578 037__ $$aART-2024-140399
000145578 041__ $$aeng
000145578 100__ $$aMontori, Blanca
000145578 245__ $$aComparison between different visual acuity tests and validation of a digital device
000145578 260__ $$c2024
000145578 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000145578 5203_ $$aPurpose: To compare different visual acuity (VA) tests (printed and digital, symbols and letters) and to validate a new device for VA testing called DIVE (Devices for an Integral Visual Examination). Methods: VA was tested in a wide spectrum of adult people with printed tests (ETDRS and LEA Symbols) and with two implemented tests in DIVE (HOTV and DIVE Symbols). We measured agreement between the different VA tests using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman method. In addition, we measured the repeatability of all tests. Results: Right eyes from 51 adult participants were included in the study. Correlation between tests was high (ICC from 0.95 to 0.97). Bland–Altman analysis showed good agreement among the different tests, with differences within reasonable clinical limits. However, slightly better VA values were obtained with DIVE HOTV and ETDRS, followed by LEA and DIVE Symbols. ETDRS had the best repeatability. Conclusion: The four evaluated VA tests provide comparable outcomes. In an adult sample, letter optotypes obtained better VA values than symbol optotypes. DIVE VA tests are reliable and well-correlated with printed VA tests.
000145578 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/PI14-01568$$9nfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICIN/AEI/DIN2021-012296
000145578 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000145578 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000145578 700__ $$aPérez Roche, Teresa
000145578 700__ $$aVilella, Maria
000145578 700__ $$aLópez, Estela
000145578 700__ $$aAlejandre, Adrián
000145578 700__ $$aPan, Xian
000145578 700__ $$aOrtín, Marta
000145578 700__ $$aLacort, Marta
000145578 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-1777-0349$$aPueyo, Victoria$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000145578 7102_ $$11011$$2615$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Microb.Ped.Radio.Sal.Pú.$$cÁrea Medic.Prevent.Salud Públ.
000145578 773__ $$g8, 3 (2024), 57 [9 pp.]$$tVision (Switzerland)$$x2411-5150
000145578 8564_ $$s900369$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/145578/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000145578 8564_ $$s2542280$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/145578/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000145578 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:145578$$particulos$$pdriver
000145578 951__ $$a2024-11-08-10:38:20
000145578 980__ $$aARTICLE