000147914 001__ 147914
000147914 005__ 20250109162738.0
000147914 0248_ $$2sideral$$a141473
000147914 037__ $$aART-2010-141473
000147914 041__ $$aeng
000147914 100__ $$aLuna, K.
000147914 245__ $$aNew advances in the study of the confidence-accuracy relationship in the memory for events
000147914 260__ $$c2010
000147914 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000147914 5203_ $$ahttps://doaj.org/article/ac6c1a27cdde4cf892916b3cbdb32def
It has been suggested that calibration, and not correlation, could be a better analysis to examine the confidence-accuracy relationship. Calibration refers to the degree in which confidence ratings correspond with the objective probability that the answer is correct. However, to date calibration has been calculated only in a few studies that have addressed eyewitness identification, and never in the memory for events. For this reason, four experiments were conducted to examine the calibration between confidence and accuracy in the recognition and recall of a criminal situation. The basic procedure involved the presentation of a crime through slides or video, followed by a questionnaire. Confidence ratings were also required. Results showed in general a good confidence-accuracy calibration, with variations depending on the memory test and the variables manipulated. They also showed that participants are slightly overconfident, and that they do not calibrate confidence well in the low-medium levels of difficulty. The main conclusion of this research is that confidence could help to evaluate the accuracy of a testimony under certain circumstances, although generalising the results to real-life situations should be done with caution. © The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context.
000147914 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
000147914 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000147914 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-3642-5337$$aMartín-Luengo, B.
000147914 773__ $$g2, 2 (2010), 55-71$$pEUR J PSYCHOL APPL L$$tEuropean journal of psychology applied to legal context$$x1889-1861
000147914 85641 $$uhttps://doaj.org/article/ac6c1a27cdde4cf892916b3cbdb32def$$zTexto completo de la revista
000147914 8564_ $$s260491$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/147914/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000147914 8564_ $$s2236901$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/147914/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000147914 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:147914$$particulos$$pdriver
000147914 951__ $$a2025-01-09-14:41:45
000147914 980__ $$aARTICLE