000148053 001__ 148053
000148053 005__ 20250908131432.0
000148053 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1075/jlac.00111.min
000148053 0248_ $$2sideral$$a141538
000148053 037__ $$aART-2024-141538
000148053 041__ $$aeng
000148053 100__ $$aMañero, Laura Miñano
000148053 245__ $$aGendering the language of genocide
000148053 260__ $$c2024
000148053 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000148053 5203_ $$aAbstract
                Exploring the Holocaust through a gendered lens, this article examines linguistic aggression against women in Nazi
                    concentration camps. While extensive scholarship connects language to genocide, the imbrication between gender, language and
                    genocide remains an under-researched subject. To further this discussion, I analyze female survivors’ memoirs to explore the
                    processes of semantic deprecation through metaphorization. Relying on cognitive semantics (Lakoff and Johnson 1980), I concentrate on euphemistic and dysphemistic metaphors that construct women’s identities in
                    terms of otherness, by means of zoosemic and reifying conceptualizations, among others. The sources under examination encompass
                    Jewish survivors Liana Millu (2001); Gisella Perl
                        (2019), and Anne-Lise Stern (2004), and non-Jewish resisters Margarete Buber-Neumann (2008); Wanda Półtawska (1989),
                    and Germaine Tillion (1997). Considering the relationship between metaphorical language and perceived stereotypes about women and
                    the feminine, and focusing on specific lexical items, I hope to unravel the nexus between linguistic aggression and patriarchal
                    structures in the concentration camp system. I argue that metaphorization reinforced women’s inferior position and perpetuated
                    gender stereotypes. I suggest that, paradoxically, this violence also triggered empowering processes of linguistic
                    reappropriation, asserting the victims’ agency.
000148053 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
000148053 592__ $$a0.706$$b2024
000148053 593__ $$aCommunication$$c2024$$dQ1
000148053 593__ $$aLinguistics and Language$$c2024$$dQ1
000148053 593__ $$aSurfaces and Interfaces$$c2024$$dQ2
000148053 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000148053 773__ $$tJournal of Language Aggression and Conflict$$x2213-1272
000148053 8564_ $$s359170$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/148053/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000148053 8564_ $$s1321513$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/148053/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000148053 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:148053$$particulos$$pdriver
000148053 951__ $$a2025-09-08-12:56:29
000148053 980__ $$aARTICLE