000148105 001__ 148105 000148105 005__ 20250114155432.0 000148105 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104548 000148105 0248_ $$2sideral$$a126224 000148105 037__ $$aART-2021-126224 000148105 041__ $$aeng 000148105 100__ $$aConanec, A. 000148105 245__ $$aHas breed any effect on beef sensory quality? 000148105 260__ $$c2021 000148105 5203_ $$aA total of 436 young cattle from 15 cattle breeds were reared in as similar conditions as possible to evaluate the impact of breed on sensory quality of beef from longissimus muscle determined by sensory analysis. Two statistical methods for processing the sensory data were compared. The analysis of variance with or without the panelist effect gave similar conclusions indicating that the robustness of the results was not dependent on the method chosen. The 4 meat descriptors (tenderness, juiciness, beef flavor and off-flavor) placed breeds into 5 groups using an unsupervised classification (hierarchical ascending classification). Aberdeen Angus, Highland and Jersey, that have a high lipid content in the muscle studied, differed from the other breeds in that they had a higher beef flavour. The dual-purpose and rustic breeds, Simmental, Casina and Marchigiana, produced significantly less juicy and less tender meat than that from breeds selected for meat production. Overall, despite significant differences previously identified for animal, carcass, muscle and beef traits for the same animals, differences in sensory scores between most of the breeds were small, with only significant differences between the few breeds that had extreme sensory profiles (such as Simmental and Pirenaica). © 2021 000148105 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/ 000148105 590__ $$a1.929$$b2021 000148105 591__ $$aAGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE$$b29 / 62 = 0.468$$c2021$$dQ2$$eT2 000148105 592__ $$a0.523$$b2021 000148105 593__ $$aVeterinary (miscellaneous)$$c2021$$dQ1 000148105 593__ $$aAnimal Science and Zoology$$c2021$$dQ1 000148105 594__ $$a3.1$$b2021 000148105 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 000148105 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-8180-8663$$aCampo M.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000148105 700__ $$aRichardson I. 000148105 700__ $$aErtbjerg P. 000148105 700__ $$aFailla S. 000148105 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-0572-9509$$aPanea B. 000148105 700__ $$aChavent M. 000148105 700__ $$aSaracco J. 000148105 700__ $$aWilliams J. L. 000148105 700__ $$aEllies-Oury M.-P. 000148105 700__ $$aHocquette J. F. 000148105 7102_ $$12008$$2700$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Produc.Animal Cienc.Ali.$$cÁrea Producción Animal 000148105 773__ $$g250 (2021), 104548 [8 p.]$$pLivest. Sci.$$tLivestock Science$$x1871-1413 000148105 8564_ $$s1063790$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/148105/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada 000148105 8564_ $$s1967547$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/148105/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada 000148105 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:148105$$particulos$$pdriver 000148105 951__ $$a2025-01-14-15:52:00 000148105 980__ $$aARTICLE