<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.5281/zenodo.14615823</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Moreu Carbonell, Elisa</dc:creator><dc:title>The regulation of neuro-rights</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2021-141494</dc:identifier><dc:description>The relationship between the law and neurotechnology is fascinating. Its impact strains the law at its seams: from a person’s identity and their free will to liability for damages. This article explores neuro-rights. The constitutional  reform  undertaken  byChile  and  the  Digital  Rights  Charter  of  the  Government  of  Spain  are  two different  ways  to  achieve  the  same  end:  regulating  and  protecting  human  rights  against  the  advances  of neurotechnology.</dc:description><dc:date>2021</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/148124</dc:source><dc:doi>10.5281/zenodo.14615823</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/148124</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:148124</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/S22-20R</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>European review of digital administration &amp; law 2, 2 (2021), 149-162</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by-nc-nd</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>