000148941 001__ 148941
000148941 005__ 20250923084443.0
000148941 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.6018/analesps.597811
000148941 0248_ $$2sideral$$a142111
000148941 037__ $$aART-2024-142111
000148941 041__ $$aeng
000148941 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-8640-4097$$aRamos-Villagrasa, Pedro J.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000148941 245__ $$aThe role of propensity to moral disengagement in the prediction of non-ethics outcomes at work
000148941 260__ $$c2024
000148941 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000148941 5203_ $$aThere is a strong evidence supporting the influence of propensity to moral disengagement (PMD) on ethical outcomes at work. Complementing previous research, this study analyzes the relationship of PMD with Big Five and Dark Tetrad personality traits, and if PMD predicts outcomes that have no ethical basis but are relevant to organizational success (i.e., task performance, adaptive performance, and work engagement). The design was cross-sectional. A total of 405 employees from different organizations being involved in the study, filling a questionnaire with the variables of interest. All workers voluntarily agreed to participate and were informed about the study, their role as participants, and the confidentiality of their responses. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlations analysis and hierarchical regression analyses. The results show that: (1) Big Five and the Dark Tetrad are determinants of PMD; (2) PDM predicts task performance, adaptive performance, and work engagement; and (3) if the 'Big Five' and the Dark Tetrad are taken into account in predicting non-ethics outcomes, PDM continues to play a role in explaining task performance and work engagement. However, more research is needed to verify these findings.
000148941 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/S31-23R
000148941 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-sa$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/es/
000148941 590__ $$a1.3$$b2024
000148941 592__ $$a0.49$$b2024
000148941 591__ $$aPSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY$$b126 / 221 = 0.57$$c2024$$dQ3$$eT2
000148941 593__ $$aPsychology (miscellaneous)$$c2024$$dQ3
000148941 591__ $$aPSYCHOLOGY$$b69 / 93 = 0.742$$c2024$$dQ3$$eT3
000148941 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000148941 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-9645-8109$$aFernández-del-Río, Elena$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000148941 700__ $$aReig-Botella, Adela
000148941 700__ $$aClemente, Miguel
000148941 7102_ $$14009$$2740$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Psicología Social
000148941 773__ $$g41, 1 (2024), 55-62$$pAn. psicol.$$tAnales de psicología$$x0212-9728
000148941 8564_ $$s547070$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/148941/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000148941 8564_ $$s3007171$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/148941/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000148941 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:148941$$particulos$$pdriver
000148941 951__ $$a2025-09-22-14:52:41
000148941 980__ $$aARTICLE