000149138 001__ 149138 000149138 005__ 20251017144617.0 000149138 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1515/iclr-2016-0069 000149138 0248_ $$2sideral$$a121942 000149138 037__ $$aART-2013-121942 000149138 041__ $$aeng 000149138 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-4372-0855$$aArlettaz, Fernando$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000149138 245__ $$aConscientious objection in the Council of Europe 000149138 260__ $$c2013 000149138 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted 000149138 5203_ $$aThe Parliamentary Assembly and the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe have been promoting the recognition of conscientious objection, mainly for military service but also in other domains, since the 1960s. However, for more than fifty years the precedents of the European Commission and the European Court of Human Rights repeatedly denied that conscientious objection could be found implicit in article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In 2011 the Court changed its standpoint and energetically affirmed that conscientious objection, at least for military service, is a derivation of freedom of conscience and religion, and that European states are thus bound to incorporate it to their internal legislations. 000149138 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es 000149138 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 000149138 7102_ $$14010$$2X$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Dcho.Pe.,Filos.D.e Hª D.$$cProy. investigación JHA 000149138 773__ $$g13, 2 (2013), 25-50$$tInternational and Comparative Law Review$$x1213-8770 000149138 8564_ $$s197440$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/149138/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada 000149138 8564_ $$s1492798$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/149138/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada 000149138 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:149138$$particulos$$pdriver 000149138 951__ $$a2025-10-17-14:20:26 000149138 980__ $$aARTICLE