000149858 001__ 149858
000149858 005__ 20251017144610.0
000149858 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1177/0969776414541136
000149858 0248_ $$2sideral$$a124943
000149858 037__ $$aART-2016-124943
000149858 041__ $$aeng
000149858 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-9390-4022$$aCasas Cortes, Maribel
000149858 245__ $$a'Good neighbours make good fences': Seahorse operations, border externalization and extra-territoriality
000149858 260__ $$c2016
000149858 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000149858 5203_ $$an recent years border externalization has emerged as a central policy framework for European Union (EU) border and migration management. New multi-lateral and bi-lateral agreements on border management have been forged between the EU, its member states, and its North African neighbours and neighbours-of-neighbours. In the process, what is meant by the ‘border’ is being transformed with implications for where the border is located, who has jurisdiction over particular spaces, and how border and migration management is undertaken. This paper analyses the spatial logics of EU border externalization practices as they are being applied to and in North and West Africa. It focuses on Operation Seahorse and the transnationally coordinated border control projects and infrastructures implemented by the Guardia Civil of Spain. Seahorse serves as an implementation case of the Migration Routes Initiative, an approach toward migration management emphasizing interregional cooperation between designated origin-transit-destination countries. The initiative is the organizing strategy of the Global Approach to Migration, the EU’s overarching framework toward migration policy. The paper shows how Seahorse is changing migration policy and re-articulating Europe’s relations with African countries, producing new bordering processes, creating new geographies of integration and border management, and redefining the practices of territory, sovereignty, and extra-territoriality.
000149858 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000149858 590__ $$a2.077$$b2016
000149858 591__ $$aURBAN STUDIES$$b8 / 38 = 0.211$$c2016$$dQ1$$eT1
000149858 591__ $$aENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES$$b36 / 105 = 0.343$$c2016$$dQ2$$eT2
000149858 592__ $$a1.374$$b2016
000149858 593__ $$aUrban Studies$$c2016$$dQ1
000149858 593__ $$aEnvironmental Science (miscellaneous)$$c2016$$dQ1
000149858 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000149858 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-0337-8271$$aCobarrubias Baglietto, Sebastian
000149858 700__ $$aPickles, John
000149858 773__ $$g23, 3 (2016), 231-251$$pEur. urban reg. stud.$$tEUROPEAN URBAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES$$x0969-7764
000149858 8564_ $$s982097$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/149858/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000149858 8564_ $$s1879608$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/149858/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000149858 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:149858$$particulos$$pdriver
000149858 951__ $$a2025-10-17-14:17:03
000149858 980__ $$aARTICLE