000150034 001__ 150034
000150034 005__ 20251017144636.0
000150034 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1177/17470218211047437
000150034 0248_ $$2sideral$$a141449
000150034 037__ $$aART-2021-141449
000150034 041__ $$aeng
000150034 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-3642-5337$$aMartín-Luengo, Beatriz
000150034 245__ $$aDeliberative process in sharing information with different audiences: Eye-tracking correlates
000150034 260__ $$c2021
000150034 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000150034 5203_ $$aResearch on conversational pragmatics demonstrates how interlocutors tailor the information they share depending on the audience. Previous research showed that, in informal contexts, speakers often provide several alternative answers, whereas in formal contexts, they tend to give only a single answer; however, the psychological underpinnings of these effects remain obscure. To investigate this answer selection process, we measured participants’ eye movements in different experimentally modelled social contexts. Participants answered general knowledge questions by providing responses with either single (one) or plural (three) alternatives. Then, a formal (job interview) or informal (conversation with friends) context was presented and participants decided either to report or withdraw their responses after considering the given social context. Growth curve analysis on the eye movements indicates that the selected response option attracted more eye movements. There was a discrepancy between the answer selection likelihood and the proportion of fixations to the corresponding option—but only in the formal context. These findings support a more elaborate decision-making processes in formal contexts. They also suggest that eye movements do not necessarily accompany the options considered in the decision-making processes.
000150034 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
000150034 590__ $$a2.138$$b2021
000150034 591__ $$aPSYCHOLOGY$$b55 / 80 = 0.688$$c2021$$dQ3$$eT3
000150034 591__ $$aPSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL$$b65 / 91 = 0.714$$c2021$$dQ3$$eT3
000150034 591__ $$aPHYSIOLOGY$$b67 / 81 = 0.827$$c2021$$dQ4$$eT3
000150034 592__ $$a0.898$$b2021
000150034 593__ $$aMedicine (miscellaneous)$$c2021$$dQ1
000150034 593__ $$aNeuropsychology and Physiological Psychology$$c2021$$dQ1
000150034 593__ $$aPsychology (miscellaneous)$$c2021$$dQ1
000150034 593__ $$aPhysiology (medical)$$c2021$$dQ1
000150034 593__ $$aPhysiology$$c2021$$dQ1
000150034 594__ $$a3.8$$b2021
000150034 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
000150034 700__ $$aMyachykov, Andriy
000150034 700__ $$aShtyrov, Yury
000150034 773__ $$g75, 4 (2021), 730-741$$pQ. J. Exp. Psychol.$$tQUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY$$x1747-0218
000150034 8564_ $$s1008851$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/150034/files/texto_completo.pdf
000150034 8564_ $$s1093552$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/150034/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon
000150034 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:150034$$particulos$$pdriver
000150034 951__ $$a2025-10-17-14:29:24
000150034 980__ $$aARTICLE