000150036 001__ 150036
000150036 005__ 20251017144636.0
000150036 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3758/s13421-018-0853-1
000150036 0248_ $$2sideral$$a141454
000150036 037__ $$aART-2019-141454
000150036 041__ $$aeng
000150036 100__ $$aLuna, Karlos
000150036 245__ $$aCognitive load eliminates the effect of perceptual information on judgments of learning with sentences
000150036 260__ $$c2019
000150036 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000150036 5203_ $$aItems presented in large font are rated with higher judgments of learning (JOLs) than those presented in small font. According to current explanations of this phenomenon in terms of processing fluency or implicit beliefs, this effect should be present no matter the type of material under study. However, we hypothesized that the linguistic cues present in sentences may prevent using font size as a cue for JOLs. Experiment 1, with short sentences, showed the standard font-size effect on JOLs, and Experiment 2, with pairs of longer sentences, showed a reduced effect. These results suggest that linguistic factors do not prevent font size from being used for JOLs. However, Experiment 3, with both short and long sentences, showed an effect of font size only for the former and not the latter condition, suggesting that the greater amount of to-be-remembered information eliminated the font-size effect. In Experiment 4, we tested a mechanism to explain this result and manipulated cognitive load using the dot-memory task. The short sentences from Experiments 1 and 3 were used, and the results replicated the font-size effect only in the low-cognitive load condition. Our results are consistent with the idea that perceptual information is used to make JOLs only with materials such as words, word pairs, or short sentences, and that the increased cognitive load required to process longer sentences prevents using font size as a cue for JOLs.
000150036 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
000150036 590__ $$a1.694$$b2019
000150036 591__ $$aPSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL$$b56 / 87 = 0.644$$c2019$$dQ3$$eT2
000150036 592__ $$a1.469$$b2019
000150036 593__ $$aArts and Humanities (miscellaneous)$$c2019$$dQ1
000150036 593__ $$aNeuropsychology and Physiological Psychology$$c2019$$dQ1
000150036 593__ $$aMedicine (miscellaneous)$$c2019$$dQ1
000150036 593__ $$aExperimental and Cognitive Psychology$$c2019$$dQ1
000150036 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000150036 700__ $$aAlbuquerque, Pedro B.
000150036 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-3642-5337$$aMartín-Luengo, Beatriz
000150036 773__ $$g47, 1 (2019), 106-116$$pMem. cogn.$$tMemory and Cognition$$x0090-502X
000150036 8564_ $$s4286826$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/150036/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000150036 8564_ $$s1932455$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/150036/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000150036 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:150036$$particulos$$pdriver
000150036 951__ $$a2025-10-17-14:29:25
000150036 980__ $$aARTICLE