<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.04.013</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Keenan, Derek F.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Resconi, Virginia C.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Smyth, Thomas J.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Botinestean, Cristina</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lefranc, Célio</dc:creator><dc:creator>.Kerry, Joseph P</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hamill, Ruth M.</dc:creator><dc:title>The effect of partial-fat substitutions with encapsulated and unencapsulated fish oils on the technological and eating quality of beef burgers over storage</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2015-108120</dc:identifier><dc:description>The effects of fat substitution (= 15%) with commercial encapsulated and unencapsulated fish oils on the technological and eating quality of beef burgers over storage [modified atmosphere packs (80% O2:20% CO2); constantly illuminated retail display at 4 °C; for 15 days] were studied using design of experiment (DOE). Burger formulations comprised beef shin (59.5%), salt (0.5%), vitamin E (0.015%) combined with varying levels of beef-fat/fish oils depending on the treatment. Increasing amounts of encapsulated and unencapsulated fish oils in burgers increased polyunsaturated fatty acid content (P &lt; 0.001). Storage decreased (P &lt; 0.001) a* values, which was in agreement with oxymyoglobin data. Vitamin E inclusion in burgers resulted in higher (P &lt; 0.01) oxymyoglobin values. TBARS values increased (P &lt; 0.001) over storage as expected. Fat substitution with unencapsulated oils increased cook loss (P &lt; 0.001) and decreased hardness (P &lt; 0.05) compared to other treatments. Optimisation predicted a burger formulation with 7.8% substitution in beef-fat with encapsulated fish oil. Panellists scored the optimised burger formulation (P &lt; 0.05) lower than controls for overall acceptability.</dc:description><dc:date>2015</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/150102</dc:source><dc:doi>10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.04.013</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/150102</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:150102</dc:identifier><dc:identifier.citation>Meat Science 107 (2015), 75-85</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>All rights reserved</dc:rights><dc:rights>http://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>