000150131 001__ 150131
000150131 005__ 20250210083428.0
000150131 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s11250-016-1173-8
000150131 0248_ $$2sideral$$a134020
000150131 037__ $$aART-2017-134020
000150131 041__ $$aeng
000150131 100__ $$aCruz-Monterrosa, Rosy G.
000150131 245__ $$aBruises in beef cattle at slaughter in Mexico: implications on quality, safety and shelf life of the meat
000150131 260__ $$c2017
000150131 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000150131 5203_ $$aIn emergent economies and developing countries of Africa, Asia and Latin America, the major cause for carcass rejection from the international market is bruising; nevertheless, many of these carcases are destined to local markets and meat processing industries for human consumption. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the effect of bruised meat on pH, microbiologic count and biogenic amine (BA) profiles along 21 days of ageing (sampling 1st, 7th, 14th and 21st day) with two packaging method (plastic bag vs vacuum) at 4 °C. A total of 50 bruised carcasses were sampled from 1000 young bulls (Brown Swiss X Zebu) of 18–24 months old and an average live weight of 450 ± 66 kg. The results showed significant differences between packaging systems and bruised vs non-bruised meat. The bruised meat caused higher biogenic amine concentrations than did non-bruised meat. We conclude that bruised meat favoured increments of biogenic amine concentrations, even more than did non-bruised meat. The plastic bag + vacuum system limited the increments of BA concentration during storage time therefore it improved shelf life of meat. These results emphasized the importance of implementing best management practices during pre-slaughter operations of cattle in order to reduce a possible risk factor for bruised meat.
000150131 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000150131 590__ $$a0.975$$b2017
000150131 591__ $$aVETERINARY SCIENCES$$b70 / 139 = 0.504$$c2017$$dQ3$$eT2
000150131 591__ $$aAGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE$$b30 / 59 = 0.508$$c2017$$dQ3$$eT2
000150131 592__ $$a0.511$$b2017
000150131 593__ $$aFood Animals$$c2017$$dQ2
000150131 593__ $$aAnimal Science and Zoology$$c2017$$dQ2
000150131 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000150131 700__ $$aReséndiz-Cruz, Verónica
000150131 700__ $$aRayas-Amor, Armando A.
000150131 700__ $$aLópez, Marcos
000150131 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-6848-1010$$aMiranda-de la Lama, Genaro C.
000150131 773__ $$g49, 1 (2017), 145-152$$pTrop. Anim. Health Prod.$$tTropical Animal Health and Production$$x0049-4747
000150131 8564_ $$s953806$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/150131/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000150131 8564_ $$s650987$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/150131/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000150131 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:150131$$particulos$$pdriver
000150131 951__ $$a2025-02-10-08:31:22
000150131 980__ $$aARTICLE