000150189 001__ 150189
000150189 005__ 20250131163449.0
000150189 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1080/09613218.2013.823538
000150189 0248_ $$2sideral$$a85471
000150189 037__ $$aART-2013-85471
000150189 041__ $$aeng
000150189 100__ $$aPérez-Bella, José M.
000150189 245__ $$aAn extended method for comparing water tightness test for facades
000150189 260__ $$c2013
000150189 5203_ $$aWatertightness tests for building facades attempt to simulate the most relevant climatic exposures for water penetration by reproducing standard conditions. Such conditions do not represent all possible climatic exposures, hence a new method was recently presented that relates test severity to watertightness performance of a facade under any operating conditions. In addition, test conditions vary for each regulatory framework (i.e. the results generated for one test cannot necessarily be extrapolated to other tests). A process is presented for considering the influence of exposure time. This allows a comparison of the severity of the conditions imposed by different watertightness tests independently of the exposure parameters. This comparison, which is based on a performance criterion, can enable a global certification of watertightness of any facade design under any operating conditions using results from only one watertightness test. The method developed herein was applied to facades under various operational conditions at a reference location, comparatively evaluating the conditions recreated by different international watertightness tests. The results suggest that American tests are more appropriate for recreating high climatic exposures, while European tests are more suitable for evaluating moderate and protected conditions of wind-driven rain and wind pressure.
000150189 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO-FEDER/BIA2012-31609
000150189 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
000150189 590__ $$a1.319$$b2013
000150189 591__ $$aCONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY$$b19 / 58 = 0.328$$c2013$$dQ2$$eT1
000150189 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000150189 700__ $$aDomínguez-Hernández, Javier
000150189 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-5215-7112$$aRodríguez-Soria, Beatriz$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000150189 700__ $$adel Coz-Díaz, Juan J.
000150189 700__ $$aCano-Suñén, Enrique
000150189 700__ $$aNavarro-Manso, Antonio
000150189 7102_ $$15004$$2510$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Ingeniería Mecánica$$cArea Ingeniería Construcción
000150189 773__ $$g41, 6 (2013), 706-721$$pBuild. res. inf.$$tBUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION$$x0961-3218
000150189 8564_ $$s1029956$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/150189/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000150189 8564_ $$s1352579$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/150189/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000150189 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:150189$$particulos$$pdriver
000150189 951__ $$a2025-01-31-16:01:16
000150189 980__ $$aARTICLE