000150466 001__ 150466
000150466 005__ 20250203211515.0
000150466 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s10806-017-9695-2
000150466 0248_ $$2sideral$$a134021
000150466 037__ $$aART-2017-134021
000150466 041__ $$aeng
000150466 100__ $$aVargas-Bello-Pérez, Einar
000150466 245__ $$aFarm animal welfare influences on markets and consumer attitudes in Latin America: the cases of Mexico, Chile and Brazil
000150466 260__ $$c2017
000150466 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000150466 5203_ $$aIn recent years, animal welfare has become an important element of sustainable production that has evolved along with the transformation of animal production systems. Consumer attitudes towards farm animal welfare are changing around the world, especially at emerging markets of Asia, Africa and Latin America. Survey-based research on consumer attitudes towards farm animal welfare has increased. However, the geographical coverage of studies on consumer attitudes and perceptions about farm animal welfare has mostly been limited to Europe, and North America. Until now, Latin American consumers’ attitudes towards animal welfare have not been well studied. Despite the fact that Mexico, Chile and Brazil belong to the same region (according to international organizations), there are marked differences between these countries in terms of their economical and geographical characteristics among other factors. Those differences potentially have an impact on consumer attitudes towards animal welfare and livestock production systems in general. Given the evidence from the literature review, it seems advisable that Latin American producers and food industry who engage in animal welfare-enhancing practices should clearly label their products with information on the type of husbandry system to reach those consumers who want to make an informed choice. Therefore, there are some aspects that need to be studied and cannot be worked separately in order to promote and understand consumer attitudes towards dairy and beef systems, such as geography, economic development, and politics.
000150466 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aAll rights reserved$$uhttp://www.europeana.eu/rights/rr-f/
000150466 590__ $$a1.24$$b2017
000150466 591__ $$aHISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE$$b9 / 61 = 0.148$$c2017$$dQ1$$eT1
000150466 591__ $$aAGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY$$b17 / 56 = 0.304$$c2017$$dQ2$$eT1
000150466 591__ $$aETHICS$$b15 / 51 = 0.294$$c2017$$dQ2$$eT1
000150466 591__ $$aENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES$$b181 / 241 = 0.751$$c2017$$dQ4$$eT3
000150466 592__ $$a0.748$$b2017
000150466 593__ $$aAgricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)$$c2017$$dQ1
000150466 593__ $$aHistory$$c2017$$dQ1
000150466 593__ $$aEnvironmental Science (miscellaneous)$$c2017$$dQ2
000150466 593__ $$aEnvironmental Chemistry$$c2017$$dQ3
000150466 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
000150466 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-6848-1010$$aMiranda-de la Lama, Genaro C.
000150466 700__ $$aTeixeira, Dayane Lemos
000150466 700__ $$aEnríquez-Hidalgo, Daniel
000150466 700__ $$aTadich, Tamara
000150466 700__ $$aLensink, Joop
000150466 773__ $$g30, 5 (2017), 697-713$$pJ. agric. environ. ethics$$tJOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS$$x1187-7863
000150466 8564_ $$s1152932$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/150466/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint
000150466 8564_ $$s739709$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/150466/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint
000150466 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:150466$$particulos$$pdriver
000150466 951__ $$a2025-02-03-20:10:21
000150466 980__ $$aARTICLE