<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection>
<dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:invenio="http://invenio-software.org/elements/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>doi:10.36151/SYBIL.28.17</dc:identifier><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:creator>Salinas Alcega, Sergio</dc:creator><dc:title>Procedural challenges: ius standi and causality</dc:title><dc:identifier>ART-2024-142959</dc:identifier><dc:description>Procedural aspects present a particular challenge in the case of international climate change litigation based on human rights. The complex nature of climate change and its global character pose the risk that a broad approach to victim status will call into question the functioning of these bodies and clearly complicate the establishment of causality. This should not mean abandoning international human rights-based climate litigation as a means of reacting to climate change, but it does require a proper assessment of what this instrument can contribute to the ultimate goal of sufficiently reducing GHG emissions.</dc:description><dc:date>2024</dc:date><dc:source>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/151025</dc:source><dc:doi>10.36151/SYBIL.28.17</dc:doi><dc:identifier>http://zaguan.unizar.es/record/151025</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>oai:zaguan.unizar.es:151025</dc:identifier><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/PID2021-124296NB-I00</dc:relation><dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MICINN/TED2021-130264B-I00</dc:relation><dc:identifier.citation>Spanish yearbook of international law 28 (2024), 301-310</dc:identifier.citation><dc:rights>by-nc-nd</dc:rights><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es</dc:rights><dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights></dc:dc>

</collection>