| Página principal > Artículos > Muscle activation during gait in unilateral transtibial amputee patients with prosthesis: The influence of the insole material density > MARC |
000151202 001__ 151202 000151202 005__ 20251017144627.0 000151202 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/jcm10143119 000151202 0248_ $$2sideral$$a125980 000151202 037__ $$aART-2021-125980 000151202 041__ $$aeng 000151202 100__ $$aSarroca, N. 000151202 245__ $$aMuscle activation during gait in unilateral transtibial amputee patients with prosthesis: The influence of the insole material density 000151202 260__ $$c2021 000151202 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted 000151202 5203_ $$aBackground: Walking is a complex process that is highly automated and efficient. This knowledge is essential for the study of pathological gait. The amputation of lower limbs involves new biomechanical load and gait patterns, and injuries due to overload or disuse may occur. The objective of this study is to assess muscle activation as part of the gait in unilateral transtibial amputee patients with prosthesis, at different speeds and with different plantar supports. Method: Included in the sample were 25 people with amputation and 25 control participants. Muscle activation was evaluated in both groups by means of surface electromyography (EMG) under normal and altered conditions. Results: Control participants did not show statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) between their muscle groups, irrespective of support and speed. However, people with amputation did show differences in muscle activity in the quadriceps, all of which occurred at the highest speeds, irrespective of support. In the analysis between groups, significant differences (p < 0.05) were obtained between the leg of the amputee patient and the leg of the control participant, all of them in the quadriceps, and at speeds 3 and 4, regardless of the insole used. Conclusions: Participants with unilateral transtibial amputation carry out more quadriceps muscle activity during gait compared to the control group. 000151202 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/B107$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/PID2019-108009RB-l00 000151202 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es 000151202 590__ $$a4.964$$b2021 000151202 591__ $$aMEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL$$b55 / 172 = 0.32$$c2021$$dQ2$$eT1 000151202 592__ $$a1.04$$b2021 000151202 593__ $$aMedicine (miscellaneous)$$c2021$$dQ1 000151202 594__ $$a4.4$$b2021 000151202 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 000151202 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-4071-1467$$aLuesma Bartolomé, M.J.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000151202 700__ $$aValero, J. 000151202 700__ $$aDeus, J. 000151202 700__ $$aCasanova, J. 000151202 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-0595-719X$$aLahoz, M.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000151202 7102_ $$11003$$2027$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Anatom.Histolog.Humanas$$cArea Anatom.Embriol.Humana 000151202 773__ $$g10, 14 (2021), 143119 [13 pp.]$$pJ. clin.med.$$tJournal of Clinical Medicine$$x2077-0383 000151202 8564_ $$s1534203$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/151202/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada 000151202 8564_ $$s2693802$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/151202/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada 000151202 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:151202$$particulos$$pdriver 000151202 951__ $$a2025-10-17-14:24:46 000151202 980__ $$aARTICLE
El sistema ha encontrado un error mientras gestionaba su petición.
Los administradores del sistema han sido avisados.
En caso de duda, póngase en contacto con deposita@unizar.es