000151635 001__ 151635
000151635 005__ 20250319155217.0
000151635 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.010
000151635 0248_ $$2sideral$$a126213
000151635 037__ $$aART-2021-126213
000151635 041__ $$aeng
000151635 100__ $$aBranquinho M.
000151635 245__ $$aEffectiveness of psychological interventions in the treatment of perinatal depression: A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
000151635 260__ $$c2021
000151635 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000151635 5203_ $$aBackground: Perinatal depression is a high prevalent mental health problem with serious consequences. Evidence about effective psychological interventions in treating perinatal depression has been increasing, but it lacks a comprehensive synthesis of findings. Methods: A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses concerning the effectiveness of psychological interventions in treating perinatal depression (depression during pregnancy and the first 12 months postpartum) in adult women was conducted. The electronic databases MEDLINE (PubMed), PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Prospero were searched, on May 2020, using a combination of keywords. Data were independently extracted by two authors and a synthesis of the results was presented. Methodological quality was independently assessed by two authors, using AMSTAR-2. Results: Seven systematic reviews were included and reported, overall, the effectiveness of psychological interventions in decreasing depressive symptoms in women in the perinatal period, both short and long-term. CBT was found to be the most effective intervention, regardless of the treatment format. Limitations: Grey literature was not searched, and some studies may overlap among the included systematic reviews. These (the included reviews) were rated with low methodological quality, which weakens the evidence of the reported results. Conclusions: CBT is currently the most evidence-based psychological intervention, provided in different delivery formats (individual, group, face-to-face or Internet-based). Further studies, including systematic reviews, with other types of psychological interventions (e.g., third-wave CBT) and with higher quality are needed.
000151635 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/S31-20D
000151635 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby-nc-nd$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
000151635 590__ $$a6.533$$b2021
000151635 591__ $$aPSYCHIATRY$$b29 / 143 = 0.203$$c2021$$dQ1$$eT1
000151635 591__ $$aPSYCHIATRY$$b37 / 155 = 0.239$$c2021$$dQ1$$eT1
000151635 591__ $$aCLINICAL NEUROLOGY$$b29 / 212 = 0.137$$c2021$$dQ1$$eT1
000151635 592__ $$a1.791$$b2021
000151635 593__ $$aPsychiatry and Mental Health$$c2021$$dQ1
000151635 593__ $$aClinical Psychology$$c2021$$dQ1
000151635 594__ $$a7.8$$b2021
000151635 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000151635 700__ $$aRodriguez-Muñoz M.D.L.F.
000151635 700__ $$aMaia B.R.
000151635 700__ $$aMarques M.
000151635 700__ $$aMatos M.
000151635 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-7293-318X$$aOsma J.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000151635 700__ $$aMoreno-Peral P.
000151635 700__ $$aConejo-Cerón S.
000151635 700__ $$aFonseca A.
000151635 700__ $$aVousoura E.
000151635 7102_ $$14009$$2680$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Person.Eval.Trat.Psicoló.
000151635 773__ $$g291 (2021), 294-306$$pJ. affect. disord.$$tJournal of Affective Disorders$$x0165-0327
000151635 8564_ $$s1045178$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/151635/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000151635 8564_ $$s2392082$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/151635/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000151635 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:151635$$particulos$$pdriver
000151635 951__ $$a2025-03-19-14:19:44
000151635 980__ $$aARTICLE