000151689 001__ 151689 000151689 005__ 20251017144631.0 000151689 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1037/com0000242 000151689 0248_ $$2sideral$$a126265 000151689 037__ $$aART-2021-126265 000151689 041__ $$aeng 000151689 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-1943-340X$$aMarín Manrique H.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza 000151689 245__ $$aGreat apes (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Pongo abelii) exploit better the information of failure than capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) when selecting tools to solve the same foraging problem 000151689 260__ $$c2021 000151689 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted 000151689 5203_ $$aIn a previous study, chimpanzees, bonobos, orangutans, and capuchin monkeys faced a task that required the use of a rigid stick-like tool to displace an out-of-reach food reward, which was located outside the cage either hanging on a string (e.g., apes) or on a table (e.g., capuchins). Three unfamiliar stick-like tools were placed on a wooden platform for the subjects to choose. Testing consisted of two consecutive trials, each with the same set of tools. Previous to the test subjects learned about the rigidity of the tool either by handling the tools (manipulation), or by observing an experimenter bending and unbending them in sequence (observation); or did not receive any information since the three tools were presented lying on the platform (visual static). In the current study, we investigated whether failing to select the right type of tool in the first trial affected subjects'' choices in the second trial. Results showed that when information about the tool rigidity was obtained before selection, great apes and capuchin monkeys changed options in their second choices. However, in the visual static condition, where no information about the rigidity of the tools had been provided before their selection, only great apes discarded wrong tool exemplars in their second trials benefitting from their own mistakes. In contrast, capuchin monkeys did not. We argue that lower attentional focus and lack of stimuli distinctiveness might account for capuchins monkeys'' failure to benefit from their own experience. 000151689 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es 000151689 590__ $$a2.318$$b2021 000151689 591__ $$aZOOLOGY$$b45 / 176 = 0.256$$c2021$$dQ2$$eT1 000151689 591__ $$aPSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY$$b76 / 146 = 0.521$$c2021$$dQ3$$eT2 000151689 591__ $$aBEHAVIORAL SCIENCES$$b39 / 53 = 0.736$$c2021$$dQ3$$eT3 000151689 591__ $$aPSYCHOLOGY$$b51 / 80 = 0.637$$c2021$$dQ3$$eT2 000151689 592__ $$a0.618$$b2021 000151689 593__ $$aPsychology (miscellaneous)$$c2021$$dQ2 000151689 593__ $$aEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics$$c2021$$dQ2 000151689 594__ $$a3.1$$b2021 000151689 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion 000151689 700__ $$aCall J. 000151689 700__ $$aVisalberghi E. 000151689 700__ $$aSabbatini G. 000151689 7102_ $$14009$$2735$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Psicolog.Evolut.Educac 000151689 773__ $$g135, 2 (2021), 273-279$$pJ. comp. psychol.$$tJournal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983)$$x0735-7036 000151689 8564_ $$s515127$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/151689/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yPostprint 000151689 8564_ $$s1308598$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/151689/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yPostprint 000151689 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:151689$$particulos$$pdriver 000151689 951__ $$a2025-10-17-14:26:44 000151689 980__ $$aARTICLE